3
$\begingroup$

It has been given in a book and on Wikipedia that:

hard bases have highest-occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) of low energy, and hard acids have lowest-unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO) of high energy.[7][8]

soft bases have HOMO of higher energy than hard bases, and soft acids have LUMO of lower energy than hard acids. (However the soft-base HOMO energies are still lower than the soft-acid LUMO energies.)[7][8]

Let us consider the energy difference between HOMO and LUMO is given by $\Delta E$. Thus, $$\Delta E (S-S)<\Delta E(H-S) < \Delta E (H-H)$$

Hence the hard-hard interaction should have been weaker than hard-soft, which is not the case. Please explain.

P.S.: I went through the reference (Meissler and Tarr) and this question but could not find a satisfying explanation.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The idea is that hard-hard interactions also have a significant element of electrostatic attraction, which isn't accounted for by MO theory. $\endgroup$ Sep 18, 2016 at 17:56
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please tell any formula that determines which path for interaction is the most feasible (say in terms of free energy) $\endgroup$ Sep 19, 2016 at 2:37

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.