1
$\begingroup$

The mathematical form of the four $\ce{sp^3}$ hybrid orbitals are given below. \begin{align} \ce{ \tag{a} sp^3 &= 1/2s + 1/2p_x + 1/2p_y + 1/2p_z\\ \tag{b} sp^3 &= 1/2s + 1/2p_x - 1/2p_y - 1/2p_z\\ \tag{c} sp^3 &= 1/2s - 1/2p_x + 1/2p_y - 1/2p_z\\ \tag{d} sp^3 &= 1/2s - 1/2p_x - 1/2p_y - 1/2p_z\\ }\end{align} For each hybrid orbital the number in front of the $\ce{s}$ and three $\ce{p}$ functions, called a coefficient, describes the contribution and relative ratio of each canonical orbital to the hybrid wave function. Add up the coefficients and prove to that these orbitals are $\ce{s^1p^3}$.

Yes, I know that the grammar is terrible on that last sentence, that is how it is written. So, I know that for an $\ce{sp^3}$ orbital it is one part $\ce{s}$ orbital and three parts $\ce{p}$ orbital. However, I have no idea what this question wants me to do. Adding up the coefficients gives me $2$, $0$, $0$, and $-1$, but I have no idea if that is how it wants me to add it up (you could ignore the sign and get $2$ every time, and show that $1/2$ is a quarter of $2$, thus proving that each component contributes a quarter to the hybridized orbital, but this seems too simple and incorrect).

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The sign on the $\text{p}_z$ orbital in (d) is wrong. It should be +, not -. $\endgroup$ – MaxW Sep 14 '16 at 23:21
  • $\begingroup$ Well, that may be true, but that's how it was given to me. There could be a typo though. $\endgroup$ – vin2 Sep 14 '16 at 23:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you provide a source for the question, or was it given to you by your teacher? I would like to remind everyone, that the notation is a contraction: $$\ce{sp^{n} = s^{\frac{1}{n+1}}p^{\frac{n}{n+1}}},$$ omitting the common factor of $\frac{1}{n+1}$. $\endgroup$ – Martin - マーチン Sep 15 '16 at 4:47
  • $\begingroup$ This was given to me as a practice quiz in my organic chemistry class. $\endgroup$ – vin2 Sep 15 '16 at 21:28
6
$\begingroup$

If a molecular orbital $\psi$ (in this case, a hybrid orbital) is constructed from an orthonormal basis set of atomic orbitals $\{\phi_n\}$ via a linear combination

$$\psi = \sum_n c_n \phi_n$$

then loosely speaking, the "amount" of $\phi_n$ in $\psi$ is given not by $c_n$, but rather by $\left|c_n\right|^2$. (See, for example, Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Section 3.4.)

Therefore, summing the four values of $c_n$ for each AO has no physical meaning.

Instead let's take wavefunction (b) for example. The coefficient in front of the s orbital is $1/2$, so the "amount" of s-orbital character is simply $\left|1/2\right|^2 = 1/4$. The coefficient in front of the $\mathrm{p}_y$ orbital is $-1/2$, so there is $\left|-1/2\right|^2 = 1/4$ $\mathrm{p}_y$-character.

Armed with this knowledge, it's incredibly easy to see that each orbital has exactly $1/4$ s-character and a total of $3/4$ p-character ($1/4$ from each p orbital), because none of the $\pm$ signs matter (the minus signs are removed by the absolute value).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer... Unfortunately quantum mechanics isn't a prerequisite for the class that I'm a part of for which this question was used, that's next year, I got this question in sophomore organic chemistry class. Your answer makes sense, but there should be another way to explain this? I dunno, it could just be a bad question. Thanks again though! $\endgroup$ – vin2 Sep 15 '16 at 4:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @vin2 I think this is the only "correct" way of explaining it. You could apply other heuristics to argue that the contribution is 1:3, such as what you described as 1/2 being a quarter of 2, but that would be an incorrect way of reaching the correct answer. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Sep 15 '16 at 5:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @vin2 The simplest (and ultimately correct) way is to think that individual unhybridized orbitals (s,p,d...) form an ortonormal basis set in multi-dimensional vector space by definition. School teaches to work with such a basis (cartesian coordinates) in 2d and 3d spaces, it should be pretty easy to extrapolate. This approach is surprisingly common in applied mathematics. $\endgroup$ – permeakra Sep 15 '16 at 6:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.