4
$\begingroup$

3,4-Dimethylhexane-3,4-diol

For this substrate, will the methyl or ethyl group migrate preferentially? I know that the migratory aptitude of Et is greater than that of Me, but I saw a lecture where the prof said migrating Et will break the bonds and that only shifting of Me is possible. Is it right? What will be the product formed?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ There is no clear cut answer as a migratory group is concern. You are right, Ethyl group has greater tendency to migrate than Methyl group. But the group which will stabilized the carbocation will move, this is the rule of thumb. $\endgroup$
    – Khan
    Commented Sep 9, 2016 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ Would make nice exercise in computational chemistry. Even semiempirical methods should give correct answer $\endgroup$
    – ssavec
    Commented Sep 9, 2016 at 11:15
  • $\begingroup$ Is it true Et shift is not allowed here? $\endgroup$
    – user34671
    Commented Sep 9, 2016 at 11:20

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

The two possible compounds resulting from the pinacol rearrangement of your substrate, 3,4-dimethylhexane-3,4-diol, are as follows.

Possible products

A quick Reaxys search throws up a paper in which this pinacol rearrangement was investigated.1 I quote directly:

Four different investigators have studied the pinacol-pinacolone rearrangement of 3,4-dimethyl-3,4-hexanediol. It was finally demonstrated by Nybergh that, contrary to the conclusions reached by the three previous investigators, the rearrangement involved the preferential migration of an ethyl group rather than a methyl group.

The paper describes how the authors carried out the reaction and analysed the mixture to determine the ratio of the two products shown above. In 1956, there was much less technology than we enjoy now, so no NMR and no HPLC. It turns out that they had to hydrogenate the products to make a mixture of the corresponding alcohols and figure out the ratio by IR spectra. The result: $70\mathrm{-}73\%$ of 3-ethyl-3-methylpentan-2-ol (corresponding to the ethyl shift), depending on the form of the starting pinacol used.

Unfortunately, I can't access the (very old) journals that claim that the Me shift happens preferentially.

References

(1) Reeve, W.; Karickhoff, M. The Pinacol Rearrangement of meso- and dl-3,4-Dimethyl-3,4-hexanediol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78 (23), 6053–6054. DOI: 10.1021/ja01604a028.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.