2
$\begingroup$

This recent question about the gauche effect led me to read this rather older answer. The problem is that I notice I am still confused.

To take the case of 1,2 difluoroethane, I drew these orbitals: orbitals of C2H4F2 in the gauche (1,2) and anti (3,4) confromations Figure1: orbitals of $\ce{C2H4F2}$ in the gauche (1,2) and anti (3,4) confromations

Now I understand that 1 (gauche) leads to more stabilization than 3 (anti). But 2 (gauche) leads to less stabilization than 4 (anti). I don't know which effect is strongest: the destabilization in 2 or the stabilisation in 1. So I don't know why the gauche conformation (1,2) leads to more stabilization than the anti (3,4).

Did I draw something wong? Did I make a mistake in reasoning? Did I miss something else? Is this one too many error-acknowledgement questions?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The most important interaction in depicted in image 1. The energetic match of these oribtals is the best from all the listed. $\endgroup$ – RBW Aug 4 '16 at 15:41
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but how do I know that it's enough to compensate for the loss of stabilization in 2 vs. 4? $\endgroup$ – SCH Aug 4 '16 at 15:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.