# Why are more electronegative atoms better leaving groups?

My book says, "halide anions are electronegative and can easily stabilise negative charge, hence are good leaving groups."

What exactly does "stabilising negative charge" mean?

I have read: "It is crucial that the leaving group be able to stabilize the additional electron density that results from bond heterolysis"

Where heterolysis means "bond breaking in which the bonding electron pair is split unevenly between the products."

So is this stabilization referring to stabilizing the charge on the $$\ce{Cl-}$$ ion in the above example? Does it just mean it is easier for something that can become stable to leave?

Does being more stable equate to being closer to neutral charge, or has it got something to do with steric hindrance ("steric hindrance occurs when the large size of groups within a molecule prevents chemical reactions that are observed") preventing reactions?

Another issue I have with this is why are more electronegative atoms better at stabilizing charge?

• The more electronegative atom will be more attracted to the nuclei of the electrophile reagent Aug 1, 2016 at 3:27
• Highly electronegative atoms aren't best leaving groups, as they are small. Generally lower charge density gives better leaving group. Aug 1, 2016 at 10:45

To answer your second question, more electronegative atoms are generally better at stabilizing negative charge because, by definition, electronegative atoms have a greater tendency to attract electron density. However, it is not only the electronegativity of an atom which determines its leaving group ability, but also its size. If an atom is larger, then it means the electrons will be spread out over a larger volume, which is more energetically favorable. This is one reason why iodide is a better leaving group than bromide, even though bromine is more electronegative than iodine. In addition, iodine is larger and it forms weaker bonds than bromine with other atoms due to poorer overlap of atomic orbitals, meaning it is easier to break iodine bonds (e.g. the bond dissociation energy is 284 kJ/mol for Br$-$CH$_3$ versus 232 kJ/mol for I$-$CH$_3$ at 298 K). Because iodine bonds are easier to break, it is easier for iodine to "leave" the molecule and is thus a better leaving group.
This can be explained in terms of $$\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$$ value. If the conjugate base of an acid is a weaker base( low $$\mathrm p K_\mathrm a$$ value), it is a better leaving group but if the conjugate base of acid is a stronger base it is a poor leaving group as in the case of the hydroxyl ion.