To estimate the approximate wavelength of electronic transitions is alkaline metals, the Rydberg formula $(1)$ may be used. Strictly speaking, it is only valid for hydrogen and hydrogen-like atoms ($\ce{He+, Li^2+, \dots}$), however, if we assume the core electrons to be of spherical symmetry we can assume the effective nuclear charge to be $1+$ and the entire core to resemble the proton of hydrogen.
$$\frac{1}{\lambda_\text{obs}} = R\left( \frac{1}{n_1^2} - \frac{1}{n_2^2}\right)\tag{1}\\
\begin{array}{ll}
\text{where:}\\
&R = \pu{1.097e-7 m^{-1}}\\
& n_1 = \text{lower shell’s principal quantum number}\\
& n_2 = \text{higher shell’s principal quantum number}\end{array}$$
For lithium, we expect the lowest transition to be $\ce{3\bond{->}2}$ while for caesium we expect it to be $\ce{7\bond{->}6}$. Plugging these values into the formula gives us:
$$\begin{align}
\lambda_\ce{3\bond{->}2}(\ce{Li}) &= \pu{656nm}\\
\lambda_\ce{7\bond{->}6}(\ce{Cs}) &= \pu{12369nm}\end{align}$$
Thus, we expect the lowest-energy photon emitted by caesium indeed to have a lower energy than that of lithium. However, this transition is firmly within the infrared wavelength range. It is therefore not observable visually.
What you are seeing in caesium’s case are a number of different transitions that do not correspond to the valence electron being excited by one shell and dropping back down. You can see all, part or a combination of:
- high-shell core electrons being displaced into the valence shell and subsequent relaxations
- relaxation of the valence electron from higher outer shells
- high-shell core electrons being displaced into the valence shell and another, higher-shell electron relaxing
- …
There are a lot of possible transitions covering the infrared range, the visible range and probably even the UV range. Some of them will be intense enough for the colour to be visible in a spectroscope or as part of the flame colour.