5
$\begingroup$

The Lewis definition of an acid is: "a compound or ionic species which can accept an electron pair from a donor compound."

Why does it specify a pair of electrons and not just a single electron?

I initially thought maybe covalent bonds require a pair of electrons but it says that is not the case here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covalent_bond#One-_and_three-electron_bonds

__

For reference:

Question from textbook : Which of the following species can act as a Lewis acid?

$\ce{NH3}$
$\ce{F-}$
$\ce{H2 O}$
$\ce{NH4+}$
$\ce{BF3}$ (answer)

I thought the answer was $\ce{NH4+}$ as it could accept an electron, but the Lewis definition specifies accepting a pair of electrons.

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If only electrons are transferred you have redox not acid-base reaction. $\endgroup$ – Mithoron Jul 12 '16 at 22:14
  • $\begingroup$ You know, could you delete the bad homework second part? Otherwise it's a nice question. $\endgroup$ – Mithoron Jul 12 '16 at 22:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks Mithoron. In the past I have been asked to provide an example. I also find sometimes there are other parts to the problem I am working on which I have not thought of in my posted question (leading me to the wrong answer) and posting the textbook question below, people often point it out. $\endgroup$ – K-Feldspar Jul 13 '16 at 4:18
7
$\begingroup$

It partially has something to do with the history of acid-base definitions. We started with the Arrhenius definition which was based on the generation of $\ce{H+}$ or $\ce{OH-}$ in aqueous solution, and then to the Bronsted-Lowry definition which moved towards acceptance or donation of $\ce{H+}$. Finally came the Lewis Definition which removed $\ce{H+}$ and left us only with electron pairs, to be consistent with the past two definitions. We couldn't just say electrons because that would have included a large class of reactions called redox reactions which are clearly not the same as acid-base.

Now, with respect to your answer to the multiple-choice question:

I thought the answer was $\ce{NH4+}$ as it could accept an electron, but the Lewis definition specifies accepting a pair of electrons.

There are two points that I would like to draw your attention to:

  1. You're right in that $\ce{NH4+}$ is an acid (more specifically we call it a conjugate acid), but by the two older definitions.
  2. However, $\ce{NH4+}$ cannot accept even one electron in this case. If you draw the Lewis structure, you'll find that although there is a net positive charge, all hydrogens have 2 electrons and the central Nitrogen has eight, fulfilling the octet rule.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.