It doesn't seem like it would, but some folks I know are adamant about boiling their water before ingesting it and the online articles I've found on this seem very subjective.

  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps they just like tea. $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Commented Jun 9, 2016 at 22:23
  • $\begingroup$ Chlorinated water is safe and might be the biggest public health improvement in human history. Before it existed, water was often contaminated with dangerous microbial pathogens like cholera. There were only two ways to guarantee pathogen-free water: mix in alcohol or boil the water. Both kill bugs and both are no longer needed if your water is chlorinated. $\endgroup$
    – matt_black
    Commented Jun 10, 2016 at 9:14
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For countries with an average temperature < 12°C or so, chlorinating is only necessary if your water infrastructure is in bad shape. In Germany it is never done (and forbidden) except as emergency measure after pipe bursts etc. $\endgroup$
    – Karl
    Commented Aug 25, 2016 at 20:29
  • $\begingroup$ @matt_black Chlorinated water tastes bad. I would pick any (safe) alternative if I have the chance. $\endgroup$
    – Jan
    Commented Sep 9, 2016 at 22:25
  • $\begingroup$ Chlorination (free or combined) is not very effective against some pathogens such as cryptosporidium, so it is not a "do-all" treatment option. $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2017 at 12:57

3 Answers 3


What do you mean by "safer"? If the water is pure to start, there's no point in boiling it. For mildly contaminated water, chlorination is inexpensive, but can form some toxic halogenated carbon compounds. Boiling is very energy intensive, and may require use of fossil fuels (unless you use a solar water heater). Both eliminate most microorganisms, though there are a few, mostly nonpathogenic ones, such as Deinococcus radioduran and others found at undersea volcanic vents, that can survive radiation, heat and other chemicals. Bacteria have even been found living in the common biocide, povidone-iodine! See this source for more information on biocides.

Better alternatives might be ultraviolet sterilization or ozonation.

  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but a boiling alert for eating/drinking is often issued by water companies when contamination of the treated water supply is suspected. It is effective. $\endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Commented Sep 9, 2016 at 16:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ True, and it is more effective than halogenation or ozonation when water has suspended particulates. It's just not efficient. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2016 at 22:06

Boiling water will kill potentially dangerous microorganisms, such as the cholera bacterium.

See "Water Disinfection for International and Wilderness Travelers" by Backer et al.

  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to Chemistry.SE! Take the tour to get familiar with this site. Mathematical expressions and equations can be formatted using $\LaTeX$ syntax. For more information in general have a look at the help center. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 10, 2016 at 5:41

Filtration is not a clear term when used together with water. It could mean anything from getting some macroscopic debris out to a bacteria-withholding microfilter. The most common usages would probably be said microfilter and the filters common in most areas of Germany which reduce water hardness. While the former may be safe, the latter isn’t. Without more information on the filtering technique, we cannot say whether it is safe or not.

Chlorination will pretty reproducibly kill each and every microorganism. However, it cannot destroy all toxic compounds and not do anything with respect to toxic heavy metals.

Boiling water will also pretty reproducibly kill all microorganisms that have been known to populate human water supplies. Yes T. aquaticus etc. etc, but I don’t think that they will ever get the chance to enter our pipes. It may also destroy some toxic chemicals, but less. And it also cannot do anything with respect to toxic heavy metals.

So boiling water is not safer than chlorination, but it isn’t really less safe either. (If you have chemicals in there that survive chlorination or boiling, you have a very serious problem anyway and probably shouldn’t even shower in the water.) However, boiling has a significant advantage, because chlorine residues in water taste bad.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.