# Can dust or fingerprints interfere in ultra-violet spectroscopy

My question pertains generally to any form of spectroscopy, but I'll focus on UV spectroscopy. I am trying to get information on carrying out spectroscopy, but most of it is theoretical. Wikipedia is completely useless. Textbooks generally go into more detail about the underlying sub atomic processes being carried out. However, they do not provide too much details about how spectroscopy works in practice. So my question is this

Will something like a fingerprint, or a speck of dust, or a label on the beaker (not even sure what material the beaker would be made of), or even air for that matter interfere with the absorption spectrum?

You can deal with this through background correction of your spectra, which is a very common practice in spectrometry and implemented in any good spectrometry software.

In the most general sense, background correction consists of recording the spectrum of the spectrometer path without the analyte, and then subtracting that background spectrum from the spectrum of the analyte. In that sense, background correction is a form of difference spectroscopy. The spectrum you obtain from this ideally contains only the peaks attributable to the analyte.

A concrete example is subtracting the absorption spectrum of a solvent in a cuvette from an analyte. You would run a cuvette with solvent but without the analyte and use that as your background, followed by a cuvette with the analyte. Subtracting the first spectrum from the second would yield the signal attributable only to the analyte, assuming that the cuvettes, solvents and atmosphere between the two runs are negligibly different. Obviously, there are a lot of potential confounds here that need to be accounted for:

• Cuvettes have to be made of the same material, have the same dimensions (path length is important!) Cuvettes and such are often designed to be maximally transparent to radiation in the region of the spectrum of interest to maximise sensitivity. This is why they sell uber-expensive quartz cuvettes for UV/vis.

• Solvents/substrates have to be of identical composition between runs. You also don't want a solvent or substrate that absorbs strongly in the spectral region of interest for similar reasons to the above.

• Cuvettes have to be homogeneously clean - if one is dirty, greasy or scuffed and scatters light more than the other, it may ruin the results.

• The atmosphere has to be the same between runs - I've heard stories about quantitative IR spectroscopy of $\ce{C=O}$ stretches being thrown out by an increase in $\ce{CO2}$ due to people breathing (how rude!). You can understand that researchers who look at atmospheric $\ce{CO2}$ concentration need very careful sampling and analysis protocols for reasons similar to this.

• Thanks! This is what I was looking for, practical information. – puk Jun 4 '13 at 19:18
• What about things like temperature, mixing/not mixing analyte, different lighting conditions, vibration (on a table for example), general sound levels in the room...Do these all through off the results? – puk Jun 4 '13 at 19:40
• @puk - Temperature, vibration and other factors could conceivably affect results for any number of reasons, however I've never encountered any real-world examples of these factors being meaningful problems. Assuming your spectrometer has a tightly-closing lid, it should be insensitive to ambient light. Unless you are doing some kind of diffusion study, an inhomogeneous solution will likely yield unacceptable results. – Richard Terrett Jun 5 '13 at 2:43