In case of hybridization of PCl5 why does the electron move to 3d orbital though 4s orbital has a lower energy?

  • $\begingroup$ quora.com/… $\endgroup$ – Kenny Lau May 27 '16 at 14:16
  • $\begingroup$ In short, 3d>4s only in group I and II. $\endgroup$ – Kenny Lau May 27 '16 at 14:16
  • $\begingroup$ Bottom of meta-synthesis.com/webbook/39_diatomics/diatomics.html $\endgroup$ – Kenny Lau May 27 '16 at 14:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $\ce{PCl5}$ is poorly described by hybridization. $\endgroup$ – bon May 27 '16 at 15:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It simply does not work like that - significant contribution of d orbitals in p black compounds was disproved many years ago. $\endgroup$ – Mithoron May 28 '16 at 22:07

It doesn’t. It simply doesn’t. The $\mathrm{3d}$ orbital has a similar energy to the $\mathrm{4s}$ one — nobody considers $\mathrm{4s}$ to take part in bonding but historically, invoking $\mathrm{d}$-orbitals was very popular.

The better description is to have an $\mathrm{sp^2}$ hybridised phosphorus atom which has a free p-orbital. The $\mathrm{sp^2}$ orbitals bond with three chlorides in traditional two-electron-two-centre bonds while the remaining $\mathrm{p}$-orbital — populated by two electrons — participates in a four-electron-three-centre bond with the two remaining chlorines. You can think of this as two resonance structures:

$$\ce{Cl-{P+}Cl3\bond{...}Cl- <-> Cl- \bond{...}{P+}Cl3-Cl}$$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.