2
$\begingroup$

I just tried conducting an experiment during lunch today. Now, I calculated this reaction 4 days ago dealing with electrochemistry,

$$\ce{SnCl2 + CuCl2 -> Cu(s) + SnCl4}$$

Theoretically, I got these 1/2 cell reactions from a couple different sources (one of which are posted below):

$$\ce{Sn^2+ -> Sn^4+ + 2e-} \quad E° = -0.15~\mathrm{V}$$

$$\ce{Cu_{(s)} -> Cu^2+ + 2e-} \quad E° = -0.34~\mathrm{V}$$

Using basic electrochemistry, we know that Copper prefers to be copper metal. Due to its overbearing power over the tin(II) ion, the copper(II) ion forces the tin(II) ion to become tin(IV).

I did not check the reduction or oxidation potential of the chloride ion (since the chloride ion is the most stable form of chlorine due to its (relative to the other compounds in this experiment) high ionization potential. I concluded that chloride would be a spectator ion.) Finally resulting in this net ionic reaction.

$$\ce{Sn^2+ + Cu^2+ -> Cu_{(s)} + Sn^4+} \quad E^\circ_{\rm cell} = 0.19~\mathrm{V}$$

I mixed the compounds in $150~\mathrm{ml}$ of deionised water. Later combining them only to end up with a milky-green colored solution. I saw some brown-red precipitate at the bottom of the beaker. however, only a small amount of what I think is copper precipitated. Tomorrow I will place the beaker with the solution onto a hot plate in hopes of speeding up the reaction.

I was wondering if a smaller difference in electrical potential between the two half cells results in a slower reaction. The other thing I was wondering concerns any other ideas or misconceptions I may have faced while conducting this experiment.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The reactions taking place are probably quite complex. First there's also copper(I) involved ($\ce{Cu^{2+} + e- -> Cu+}, E° = +0.16~\mathrm{V}$.) Second the formation of complexes and precipitates that depends on pH and anions present. $\endgroup$
    – aventurin
    Apr 28, 2016 at 18:53
  • $\begingroup$ Tin 2 in solutions is oxidized by air, and fine copper powder too. $\endgroup$
    – permeakra
    Apr 28, 2016 at 20:02

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This is indeed a redox reaction between copper and tin, but you should instead use reduction potentials for the $+2$ ions to calculate the potential.

This might be quite an exothermic reaction. http://www.periodicvideos.com/videos/mv_copper_chloride.htm

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.