3
$\begingroup$

As far as I know, negative hyperconjugation means, that we have electrons that are transferred from a p- or $\pi$- to a $\sigma^*$-orbital. In the lecture, we analyzed a TMS-substituted tricyclopentane derivate (tricyclo[2.1.0.0$^{2,5}$]-pentane-3-one). Apparently, the first one on the left can't be deprotected even by TBAF or boiling MeLi, but the second one easily. If I could deprotect the first one, we'd obtain a 3° carbanion that would do negative hyperconjugation with the TMS group. Would't this be favourable and should be readily feasible?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The sigma bonding C-Si electrons would feed up the p orbital in carbon, but as it is occupied, a net destabilization will result, as the antibonding orbital produced by the hyperconjugation would be more destabilized than the bonding orbital would be stabilized. There is big energy difference between the p orbital on carbon and the sigma antibonding orbital C-Si for hyperconjugation to take place to a significant extent, $\endgroup$ – RBW Apr 10 '16 at 15:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.