3
$\begingroup$

I'm writing a novel set 28 years in the future in which the protagonist attempts to manipulate a communications satellite by directing a swarm of nanorobots (or possibly micro-robots, depending on plausibility).

An initial wave of nanorobots is tasked with creating a path, such as a tunnel, through the satellite's casing so that a second wave can enter.

Inspired by real-life nanotechnology that delivers chemotherapy drugs only to leukemia cells, I thought to have each nanorobot carry a tiny amount of super acid, each depositing its payload onto the same spot of the metallic hull of the satellite. My thinking is that the vacuum of space would carry off the product of metal + acid, leaving fresh metal for the next microrobot to attack.

Is it plausible to erode a narrow path through metal in this manner? What acids would be well-suited to the task? How would I go about calculating the order-of-magnitude number of nano-robots needed to complete a path through a given thickness of (let's say) aluminum?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure you'd need a super acid. Also, how would they contain that? I think maybe just a strong acid/oxidizer would work. $\endgroup$ – SendersReagent Mar 8 '16 at 0:19
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure of the specific mechanics of containing a super acid, though in practice highly potent chemotherapy drugs are already contained in nano-scale containers (see linked article). I did come across nano-thermite (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nano-thermite) The article speaks of macro-scale use but it seems it might work as well if delivered at small scale to a tiny target. $\endgroup$ – Eric J. Mar 8 '16 at 0:32
  • $\begingroup$ What would the protagonist prefer to do: a) turn the satellite into debris, b) only kill its function, or c) reuse it for his own purposes? $\endgroup$ – Klaus-Dieter Warzecha Mar 8 '16 at 19:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @KlausWarzecha: The idea is to create a small entry in the hole, then a different type of nanoprobe will enter through that hole to reprogram the satellite's encryption system. $\endgroup$ – Eric J. Mar 8 '16 at 20:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I knew that you would decide for the most challenging option: tinkering in geostationary orbit ;) $\endgroup$ – Klaus-Dieter Warzecha Mar 8 '16 at 21:31
2
$\begingroup$

Depending on the material that the casing is made out of, you could have a mercury or gallium payload. They both are capable of significantly weakening the structures of some metals (such as aluminum). See the following video of gallium weakening a coke can. Mercury can also weaken the structure, especially in conjunction with gallium as seen here. Mercury will form an amalgam with aluminum and significantly weaken it, as will gallium. You might conceivably have nanobots bring a payload of the two metals to weaken the structure, especially since they are not nearly as reactive with other things.

Unfortunately, this would only work if the structure you are trying to damage is primarily aluminum, but might give a starting place for non-acidic solutions.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Problem is it's supposed to be in orbit - there would be probably problem with any liquid as they don't stay this way in void, also @EricJ. $\endgroup$ – Mithoron Mar 18 '16 at 22:28
  • $\begingroup$ @Mithoron to contain any liquid until use, you just need to maintain its vapor pressure. For Gallium that's extremely low, and mercury only reaches 1 mm of mercury (1 Torr) at 400 K, dropping to a few mTorr at 300K. Once exposed to space, un-reacted/amalgamed mercury would slowly evaporate, but the gallium should stick around quite a while. cf powerstream.com/vapor-pressure.htm for plots of vapor pressure vs temperature. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jun 17 '17 at 1:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.