2
$\begingroup$

Consider a gas blending system consisting of two mass flow controllers, A and B, set to control flow to $f_\mathrm{A}$ and $f_\mathrm{B}$, respectively. Consider that flow controller A is metering the pure gas of interest, which has an actual mole fraction of $x_\mathrm{A}$. Flow controller B is metering a make-up gas which coincidently may contain trace amounts of gas A at a mole fraction of $x_\mathrm{B}$.

The mass flow controllers provide continuous estimates of $f_\mathrm{A}$ and $f_\mathrm{B}$; these are measured quantities. Suppose also that we did some experiments and found the values of $x_\mathrm{A}$ (very close to unity or $\pu{1E6 ppm}$) and $x_\mathrm{B}$ (approaching zero, likely ones to tens of ppm).

To first order, the following equations provide reasonable estimates of the concentration of gas A in the blended stream at near atmospheric pressure, room temperature. Experiments were carried out with $\ce{CO2}$ (gas A) in $\ce{N2}$ (gas B). A $\ce{CO2}$ gas analyzer was used to estimate the mole fraction of gas A in the blend, $x_\mathrm{T}$. We can compute the mass flow ratio of gas A by

$r = \dfrac{f_\mathrm{A}}{(f_\mathrm{A} + f_\mathrm{B})}$

or

$r = \dfrac{f_\mathrm{A}}{f_\mathrm{T}}$

where $f_\mathrm{T} = f_\mathrm{A} + f_\mathrm{B}$. Further, we compute the mole fraction of gas A in the blend as

$x_\mathrm{T} = r \cdot \left(x_\mathrm{A} - x_\mathrm{B} \right) + x_\mathrm{B}$

My question again is: How do we compute the mole fraction of an ideal gas in a stream blended by mass flow controllers?

I'd like to do this in a rigorous manner, or correctly, possibly accounting for any non-ideal behavior of $\ce{CO2}$ in a $\ce{N2}$ make-up gas.

I came across this reference and believe the key to my problem is addressed therein. The solution may involve the empirical rule of Lewis & Randall whereby the mole fraction of a component is equated to a ratio of fugacities of the component in a mixture to the pure component. Certainly being able to compute the virial coefficients for the components may prove useful. A key may also be converting a flow into a volume with an assumed time step.

Should I attempt to apply the some of the equations presented in the reference noted above?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to Chemistry.SE! Take the tour to get familiar with this site. Mathematical expressions and equations can be formatted using $\LaTeX$ syntax. If you want to know more, please have a look here and here. We prefer to not use MathJax in the title field, see here for details. This appears to be a homework question, please share your thoughts and attempts towards the solution. $\endgroup$ Feb 9, 2016 at 7:53
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the comments. I can apply latex formatting; I wasn't aware this was supported. This is not a homework question. I will happily explore the solution further if deemed necessary. Please provide feedback as to whether my most recent edits are okay, or whether I should add more content / show more work towards the solution. $\endgroup$
    – John Chris
    Feb 9, 2016 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ What have you done in your analysis so far that says this applies only to ideal gases, and not to mixtures in general. $\endgroup$ Feb 22, 2016 at 20:50
  • $\begingroup$ Can anyone make any suggestions as to further analysis? I would be happy to add detail to the question. $\endgroup$
    – John Chris
    Jul 28, 2018 at 12:07

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.