According to the periodic table trend for I.E. Silicon should have a higher 2nd ionization energy than Aluminum so I'm confused.


Let us look at the electronic configurations of aluminum and silicon and their respective cations.

$\ce{Al}: [\ce{Ne}]\mathrm{3s^2\, 3p^1}$

$\ce{Si}: [\ce{Ne}]\mathrm{3s^2\, 3p^2}$

$\ce{Al^2+}: [\ce{Ne}]\mathrm{3s^1}$ It involves removing from $\mathrm{3s}$ sub shell

$\ce{Si^2+}: [\ce{Ne}]\mathrm{3s^2}$ It involves removing from $\mathrm{3p}$ sub shell

A $\mathrm{3p^1}$ electron has lower binding energy than that of $\mathrm{3s^2}$ electron.

It is due to more screening effect (as the predecessor sub-shells are higher in $\ce{Si}$) and higher stability attained by having a completely filled $\mathrm{3s}$ sub-shell

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi and welcome to chemistry.stackexchange.com. Feel free to take a tour of the site. I edited your post to include the \ce{...} and the \mathrm{...} syntaxes for MathJax. Learn more about them in the help center or this collection of editing hints. Nice first answer. $\endgroup$ – Jan Jan 25 '16 at 13:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.