4
$\begingroup$

The approximate stretching frequencies are as follows:

Acid: $1710$, Ketone: $1715$, Ester: $1730$ (all $\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$)

This would seem to suggest that the acid decreases the carbonyl bond strength and the ester weakens it. This must be as a result of the fact that in the ester inductive withdrawal is more effective than resonance and the converse is true in the acid. However, I am finding it hard to reasonably justify why. Presumably this is also linked to the relative electrophilicity of the ester and the acid.

|improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

First things first, it's important to realise that functional groups may have IR frequencies over quite a broad range. I've provided the table below, from which you can see that actually there is a great deal of overlap depending upon the actual 'environment' of the functional group in question. Ketones and acids, for example, cover a very similar portion of the spectrum.

Stretching frequencies of common carbonyl groups (Taken from Introduction to Spectroscopy, Pavia and Lampman. enter image description here

That said, the difference between the frequency range of an acid vs an ester is an interesting one, as on the surface of it they are electronically quite similar (in both cases the carbonyl is next to an electronegative oxygen).

@RobChem: This would seem to suggest that the acid decreases the carbonyl bond strength and the ester weakens it. This must be as a result of the fact that in the ester inductive withdrawal is more effective than resonance and the converse is true in the acid.

In your statement, you may have gotten a little confused, remember that the stretching frequency increases with bond strength. Therefore using your data we can say that the ester is stronger than the ketone whilst the acid is weaker.

We can explain the ester being stronger by considering the effect of the electronegative oxygen withdrawing electron density:

enter image description here

This argument however, fails to explain why the carboxylic acid has a stretching frequency below that of the ketone, since, as was already said, they both have the oxygen adjacent to the carbonyl.

One rationalisation for this is that the carboxylic acid group doesn't exist in isolation but rather interacts with other carboxylic acids in a hydrogen bonding interaction, which weakens the C=O bond:

enter image description here

This hydrogen bonding concept is universal, for instance in methyl salicylate, the C=O bond has dropped to well below that expected for an ester:

enter image description here

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Silverstein et al., Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds writes that the C=O stretch in a monomeric carboxylic acid is ~$1760~\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$, which of course supports what you already said. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol♦ Jan 6 '16 at 12:06
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry. I do not follow: We can explain the ester being stronger by considering the effect of the electronegative oxygen withdrawing electron density: $\endgroup$ – adianadiadi Mar 13 '16 at 20:16
  • $\begingroup$ You wrote This argument however, fails to explain why the carboxylic acid has a stretching frequency below that of the ketone, since, as was already said, they both have the oxygen adjacent to the carbonyl. I think you meant to write ester instead of ketone. $\endgroup$ – Ryan Ward Oct 11 '16 at 21:10
-1
$\begingroup$

Some carbonyls behave as partial single bond character. So bond strength decreases and str freequency also decreases form the actual value. It's explained by dipole moment.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How is it explained by dipole moment? Your answer is lacking without that info. $\endgroup$ – M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ Mar 13 '16 at 18:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.