I was just reading about p Block elements from two different books. Both books say that $\ce{SF6}$ is extremely stable in 16th group due to steric reasons but my question is why is it more stable than $\ce{SeF6}$ and $\ce{TeF6}$ when $\ce{S}$ is more electronegative and smaller than $\ce{Te}$ and $\ce{Se}$ and so it would bring the electrons in bonding with fluorine closer to the central atom i.e $\ce{S}$ and thus it would bring the electrons closer and there would be more repulsion between the electron pairs.

Maybe this can be explained by Fajans rules that due to such conditions $\ce{SF6}$ has more covalent character than others and thus is more stable. But if this is the reason, where does "steric" come in here?


$\ce{SF6}$ is extremely stable for purely steric reasons, because S is completely blocked by fluorine atoms from all directions, so the reactions starting with an attack on S that otherwise would readily occur (hydrolysis, etc.) never have the chance to occur. This has nothing to do with electronegativity. For another similar example, look at $\ce{CCl4}$.

Now, the word "stable" is commonly used in two different senses. A compound may be stable by itself, i.e. not prone to spontaneous decomposition; in that sense $\ce{SF6}$, $\ce{SeF6}$, and $\ce{TeF6}$ are all totally stable under normal conditions, so there is nothing to compare. On the other hand, we may consider "stability" as inability to react with common reagents, e.g. water. In that sense $\ce{SF6}$ is indeed far more "stable" than the analogs, and that for the steric reasons (see above).

As for the thermal stability, that's another story altogether, so I don't really know how it would turn out. I wouldn't be surprised if $\ce{TeF6}$ would indeed happen to be the most stable of them all.

  • $\begingroup$ Ok it does not react, but does it mean it is more stable? $\endgroup$ – Quark Dec 24 '15 at 19:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Quark that's a twisted question. How do you define stability? $\endgroup$ – M.A.R. Dec 24 '15 at 19:41
  • $\begingroup$ Is my terminology wrong? If I talk about the thermal stability, TeF6 would be the most stable right? but when I say least reactive , I'd say SF6 right? $\endgroup$ – Quark Dec 24 '15 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ So what you’re saying is basically $\ce{SF6}$ is not only (relatively) stable but also inert, isn’t it? $\endgroup$ – Jan Nov 3 '16 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think I said anything that broad. "Inert" may mean a variety of things (thermodynamic or kinetic); the same goes for "stable". $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Nov 3 '16 at 19:10

Assuming you don't know what's inert pair effect. Inert pair effect is usually observed in P block elements. Basically higher oxidation states stability decreases down the group. The reason is if you write the electronic configurations you will see that the distance between participating s and p orbitals increases.....and hence s orbitals cannot participate even if they do the compound is not much stable. Now what is the conclusion? Conclusion is that the elements with higher oxidation state in the bottom of the group are strong oxidizing agents.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.