# How to distinguish diastereomers of unsaturated ketones by NMR?

I am synthesising a natural product that contains an α-methylated α,β-unsaturated ketone (see image below). The natural product’s stereochemistry is an (E) configured double bond. I selected this double bond as one of the retrosynthetic cuts of the overall molecule and I want to be sure that when I synthesise it that I get the correct stereochemistry. Is there any easy way to distinguish the (E) from the (Z) isomer?

Generic structure of an (E)-α-methylenone.

• I do wonder why I got a downvote for this question. If the person who did so could leave a comment, I would be thankful.
– Jan
Dec 20 '15 at 22:36
• Probably didn't like your hat-seeking behaviour. I mean, hat-seeking or not, it's still a good Q&A and we can do with more content like this. (flag as obsolete or too chatty if you feel evil) Mar 29 '17 at 14:48

According to Noack and Jones, unsaturated ketones with an α substituent — even if it is only methyl — generally adopt an s-trans conformation due to steric reasons. Only if the α substituent is hydrogen can an equilibrium between s-cis and s-trans be observed.[1] Therefore, we should better draw the structure this way:

$$\hspace{30ex}$$
$$\hspace{28ex}$$s-trans configuration of α-methylenones

I already explicitly added the unsaturated hydrogen atom to the image. As we can see, it is either rather close to the keto group or pointing away from it. If the alkene’s configuration is (E) and the hydrogen is thus pointing ‘inward’ it experiences a larger deshielding due to the close carbonyl group. Therefore, its signal in 1H-NMR is shifted to lower field when compared to the (Z)-configured double bond.

You can also compare experimental shifts. Unfortunately I didn’t find a pair of identical molecules differing only in the double bond orientation, and not even the solvent is the same, but I think the data still shows a clear trend, namely that for (E) enones the chemical shift is in the high alkene range while for the (Z) enones it is in the low range:

$$\hspace{33ex}$$
(E)-3-methylhex-3-en-2-one. 1H-NMR ($$500~\mathrm{MHz}$$, $$\ce{CDCl3}$$) $$\delta =$$ $$\mathbf{6.59}$$ (tq, $$J = 7.2,1.3~\mathrm{Hz}$$, 1 H), $$2.28$$ (s, 3 H), $$2.24$$ (app. qnt, $$J = 7.4~\mathrm{Hz}$$, 2 H), $$1.73$$ (s, 3 H), $$1.05$$ (t, $$J = 7.6~\mathrm{Hz}$$, 3 H).[2]

$$\hspace{33ex}$$
(Z)-3-methylnona-3,8-dien-2-one. 1H-NMR ($$300~\mathrm{MHz}$$, $$\ce{C6D6}$$) $$\delta =$$ $$5.71$$ (ddt, $$J = 17.1, 10.5, 6.6~\mathrm{Hz}$$, 1H), $$\mathbf{5.38}$$ (tt, $$J = 7.5, 1.5~\mathrm{Hz}$$, 1 H), $$4.92$$$$5.02$$ (m, 2 H), $$2.29$$ (q, $$J = 7.5~\mathrm{Hz}$$, 2 H), $$1.92$$ (q, $$J = 7.2~\mathrm{Hz}$$, 2 H), $$1.85$$ (s, 3 H), $$1.60$$ (t, $$J = 2.7~\mathrm{Hz}$$, 3 H), $$1.35$$ (qnt, $$J = 7.5~\mathrm{Hz}$$, 2 H).[3]

## References:

[1]: K. Noack, R. N. Jones, Can. J. Chem. 1961, 39, 2225. DOI: 10.1139/v61-294.

[2]: W. F. Austin, Y. Zhang, R. L. Danheiser, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3905. DOI: 10.1021/ol051307b.

[3]: L. Jiao, C. Yuan, Z.-X. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4421. DOI: 10.1021/ja7100449.

• Wouldn't a more accurate way of determining it be getting an NOESY? Apr 18 '16 at 17:30