First order phase changes occur when one local minima of the Gibbs Free Energy becomes deeper than another. Thus at 1 atm and 99 °C, the Gibbs Free Energy of liquid water is less than the Gibbs Free Energy of steam at those conditions (though both states form local minima). As the temperature increases, the relative depths of the two minima change: at 100 °C they are the same depth, and above 100 °C the vapour-phase minimum is lower.

I'm wondering if similar first-order changes can occur in chemically reacting systems? It seems to me that equilibrium constants always change continuously with temperature: are there any situations in which this isn't the case, and there exist discrete jumps in chemical compositions? And if these jumps in the deepest minima of the Gibbs Free Energy never occur in chemically reacting systems, do we know why not? Of course, situations in which a chemical reaction is accompanied by a phase change don't count!


Well, let's see. As you know, the equilibrium constant is determined by the reaction's $\Delta_rG:\;K=e^{-\frac{\Delta G}{RT}}$, so a discrete jump in the former means a discrete jump in the latter. What is that $\Delta_rG$? That's the sum of $\Delta_fG$ of products minus that of starting compounds. Now what is the $\Delta G$ of formation of a compound? A continuous function, unless there is a phase transition, which by your problem definition is not the case. Well, a linear combination of a few continuous functions is still a continuous function.

|improve this answer|||||
  • $\begingroup$ What if there are two competing equilibria? With different equilibrium constants, that vary with temperature in different ways? Isn't that exactly analogous to the phase transition example and contrary to your answer? $\endgroup$ – Curt F. Nov 30 '15 at 7:02
  • $\begingroup$ Sounds mighty like there is a flaw in my reasoning, yet still I can't pinpoint one. Let's look at it this way. If $\Delta G$ of a phase equilibrium crosses 0, a phase transition happens. That's not our case. What happens if $\Delta G$ of an equilibrium within one phase crosses 0? Looks like nothing. Looks like the equilibrium concentrations would behave like continuous functions of $K$ and hence of $\Delta G$. Is that so? $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Nov 30 '15 at 8:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.