2
$\begingroup$

The components used for etching copper are acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide and sodium chloride. I think the equation may be similar to this:

$$\ce{2H3C2O2H + H2O2 + 2NaCl + Cu -> CuCl2 + 2H3C2O2Na + 2H2O}$$

Is this equation correct? There are a lot of bubbles created. What is the gas that is given off?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi and welcome to chemistry.stackexchange.com. Feel free to take a tour of the site. I improved the formatting of your post with MathJax. For more information on how to do so yourself, check out the help center, this meta post or this one. $\endgroup$ – Jan Nov 11 '15 at 19:18
1
$\begingroup$

Well your equation balances but that isn't the right reaction.

First lets break this down into half cell reactions.

Oxidation reaction

$\ce{Cu_{(s)} <-> Cu^{2+}_{(aq)} + 2e^{-}}$

Reduction reaction

$\ce{H2O2 + 2 H^+ + 2e^{-} -> 2 H2O_{(l)}}$

Decomposition reaction

Hydrogen peroxide spontaneously decomposes in acid solution.

$\ce{2H2O2 -> 2H2O_{(l)} + O2_{(g)}}$

Stoichiometric reaction between copper and hydrogen peroxide

So the stoichiometric reaction between copper and hydrogen peroxide is:

$\ce{H2O2 + 2 H^+ + Cu_{(s)} -> Cu^{2+}_{(aq)} + 2 H2O_{(l)}}$

the $\ce{2 H^+}$ ions come from the vinegar. (Let's use $\ce{HOAc}$ for vinegar).

$\ce{H2O2 + 2 HOAc + Cu_{(s)} -> Cu^{2+}_{(aq)} + 2OAc^{-} + 2H2O_{(l)}}$

Sodium chloride's Role

Finally the role of the $\ce{NaCl}$ plays in the etch. The $\ce{NaCl}$ must be fairly high to drive the $\ce{Cu^{2+}}$ to a copper chloride complex. This thus reduces the "free" $\ce{Cu^{2+}}$ in solution which keeps the electrochemical potential of copper high so that the solution keeps dissolving copper. (Think of the half-cell copper reaction as if it is in a battery. The voltage of the half-cell would drop as the copper builds up.)

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Before I edit it away amoung another minor typo I found, is there a reason why you write $\ce{Cu+^2}$ rather than $\ce{Cu^2+}$? $\endgroup$ – Jan Nov 12 '15 at 9:23
  • $\begingroup$ Changed it. Didn't realize that there was such a strong convention, or that anyone would care... $\endgroup$ – MaxW Nov 12 '15 at 16:23
  • $\begingroup$ Will, I'm not aware of any conventions, but I only ever saw $\ce{Cu^2+}$ (or $\ce{Cu++}$ from a particularly old biology teacher) so I thought I'ld better ask before doing things wrong ;) $\endgroup$ – Jan Nov 12 '15 at 16:35
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Jan - LOL Pauling "The Nature of the Chemical Bond" used the $\ce{Cu^{++}}$ notation so your odd biology teacher was in good company.... $\endgroup$ – MaxW Nov 12 '15 at 16:50
  • $\begingroup$ I guess "++" was a good notation until the number of pluses required got larger ;) $\endgroup$ – SasQ Nov 20 '19 at 19:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.