18
$\begingroup$

According to this link, benzene is able to insert itself into the human DNA. It isn't an authoritative source and appears to be quite biased, so I'm wondering if there's any truth to this.

The resonance hybrid structure of the benzene molecule causes it to have electrostatic potential, be very stable, and insert itself into human DNA. Taken together, these molecular and electrical characteristics of benzene make it carcinogenic to humans.

$\endgroup$
35
$\begingroup$

I will start my answer with a preface that the website linked to in the question is a pseudoscience website (and I am glad that it has vanished from the face of this earth, only accessible via the Wayback Machine). These people use scientific-sounding jargon that sounds impressive to the lay reader, but any actual scientist will know that it is simply rubbish. The objective is usually to fear monger, or to promote some product of theirs that has no special properties. Unfortunately, these seem to be becoming more and more prevalent recently.

However, the premise of the question is sound: benzene itself is known to cause cancer in humans. It is listed as a Class 1 carcinogen, meaning that there is evidence for carcinogenicity in humans.

As with many things in molecular biology, we do not actually know the full mechanism by which benzene causes cancer. However, there have been a number of papers written on the topic: some of them are linked at the bottom of this post.

Exactly which metabolite of benzene causes cancer is not known. It is likely to be a combination of them. The first step is oxidation of benzene by the enzyme cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) to benzene oxide, which exists in equilibrium with oxepin (via a 6π electrocyclic reaction). The cytochrome P450 enzymes are found in the liver, and their role is generally to insert oxygen atoms into molecules, making them more polar and water-soluble, so that they can be excreted. For more information about this process, see Drug metabolism on Wikipedia.

Initial oxidation of benzene

These undergo further reactions, catalysed by various other enzymes, to give a large range of metabolites:

Metabolic products of benzene

In particular,

  • The benzoquinones have been shown to inhibit DNA topoisomerase II, an enzyme that makes temporary cuts in double-stranded DNA in order to "unwind" DNA that has been entangled. It plays a key role in many cellular processes such as DNA replication, DNA repair, and chromosome segregation (during cell division); therefore, inhibition may lead to chromosome breakage or failure to segregate.
  • The same quinones can undergo a process called redox cycling, where they undergo an enzymatic reaction in which a single electron is added to them to form a radical anion. These species are then released, and react with molecular oxygen $\ce{O2}$ to give the superoxide anion, $\ce{O2^-}$... and then the process repeats itself. The buildup of $\ce{O2^-}$ (and other reactive oxygen species) leads to oxidative stress and DNA damage.
  • (E,E)-muconaldehyde has been recently shown to form an adduct with two molecules of deoxyguanosine, i.e. the guanine bases in DNA. Here, R represents the rest of the deoxyribose sugar. Intra- or inter-chain links can be formed via this method, which then lead to inaccurate replication or chromosomal aberrations.
    A mechanism was proposed in reference 3. It is not reproduced here but it is not difficult to imagine how such a reaction might happen: nitrogen atoms in guanine are nucleophilic, and literally every carbon in muconaldehyde is electrophilic.

Cross-linking of guanine bases by muconaldehyde

The literature on the topic contains much more information than I can write in here. Reference 4 is a relatively recent review on the topic, which would be a decent starting point to find further information.

Regardless of what mechanism it is, one thing is certain: benzene itself and its molecular properties are not likely to be the cause of its carcinogenicity. It is almost certain that multiple metabolites of benzene are the culprits.


References

  1. Chen, H.; Eastmond, D. A. Topoisomerase inhibition by phenolic metabolites: a potential mechanism for benzene's clastogenic effects. Carcinogenesis (Oxford) 1995, 16 (10), 2301–2307. DOI:10.1093/carcin/16.10.2301
  2. Rappaport, S. M.; Kim, S.; Lan, Q.; Li, G.; Vermeulen, R.; Waidyanatha, S.; Zhang, L.; Yin, S.; Smith, M. T.; Rothman, N. Human benzene metabolism following occupational and environmental exposures. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2010, 184 (1–2), 189–195. DOI:10.1016/j.cbi.2009.12.017.
  3. Harris, C. M.; Stec, D. F.; Christov, P. P.; Kozekov, I. D.; Rizzo, C. J.; Harris, T. M. Deoxyguanosine Forms a Bis-Adduct with E,E-Muconaldehyde, an Oxidative Metabolite of Benzene: Implications for the Carcinogenicity of Benzene. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 24 (11), 1944–1956. DOI:10.1021/tx2002838.
  4. Hartwig, A. The role of DNA repair in benzene-induced carcinogenesis. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2010, 184 (1–2), 269–272. DOI:10.1016/j.cbi.2009.12.029.
$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I am not sure about benzene but larger, multi-ringed aromatic compounds like phenanthrenes can stack themselves between DNA base pairs and cause mutations (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137070). $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Oct 20 '15 at 4:49
7
$\begingroup$

Um, what?

Toluene — $\ce{C6H5CH3}$, a relatively more reactive derivative of benzene — is highly water-insoluble, so can't be easily disposed of body. A group of six (so is reported) cytochrome P450 enzymes in liver are responsible for oxidizing it to benzoic acid, hence making it more disposable.

Benzene — $\ce{C6H6}$ — doesn't have any methyl groups and the enzyme changes it into some really reactive chemicals species, which can react with and alter your DNA, causing mutation. That's why benzene is carcinogenic.

Unfortunately, the paper discussing its metabolism is behind a paywall, but its title clearly states induction of cytochrome P450s.

The site seems like rubbish to me; something like a 10-year-old grabbing an introduction to organic chemistry and doodling what they understood from the first two lines of the introduction to aromatic compounds; he seems to imply that "aspirin", "naproxen", "celexib" and many other famous drugs are "sources" of benzene and carcinogenic. So$\,\ldots$!

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

First off, the linked site is a complete load of rubbish, claiming that any substance with a benzene ring is toxic. Sodium causes burns and chlorine is a toxic gas, so by the same logic we should be completely avoiding sodium chloride.

M.A.Ramenazi correctly points out that relative solubility in water and fat are important. Both toluene and benzene, once dissolved in fat, are difficult to excrete, but toluene is more easily converted into an excretable water soluble compound (benzoic acid) due to its methyl group, which may account for its being less harmful than benzene. The detergents mentioned in the are article are about equally soluble in water and fat, so they are excreted fairly easily (ironically, the hydrophilic group on these molecules is based on benzenesulfonic acid!)

Solubility obviously isn't everything, the different metabolic pathways of different substances are also massively important.

However, this idea that aromatic ring systems can intercalate with DNA didn't come from nowhere. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercalation_(biochemistry) http://www.jonathanpmiller.com/intercalation/ If we substitute the odd term "resonance hybrid structure" for the more accurate "flat aromatic structure" we see that these links indicate that some compounds with multiple benzene rings are believed to owe their toxicity to their ability to intercalate with DNA.

Flat aromatic molecules are able to intercalate between the bases of DNA, much as graphite is formed of flat aromatic layers with weak secondary bonding interactions between the layers. But note that all the toxins mentioned in the above link also have polar groups, which are probably just as essential to their mode of action as the flat aromatic structure.

For benzene itself, the mechanism of toxicity explained in Orthocresol's answer seems much more plausible.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yeah, I always thought it had to do with that actually, but whatever brief research I did the other day told me that it was more of the metabolites. I'm sure there is some paper out there that shows that benzene itself can intercalate with DNA. Benzopyrene is a well-known example of an aromatic compound that does so. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Oct 16 '15 at 22:43

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.