4
$\begingroup$

I'm a little confused about the interpretation of the 1s orbital diagram. I know that the outer boundary is where the wave function of the 1s orbital has a constant value, which means means there's a constant probability of finding an electron on that outer boundary.

The reason I'm confused is because, isn't there an infinite number of distances from the nucleus where there's a constant probability of finding an electron around a cross-sectional slice of the sphere?

What I mean is, if we choose r, meaning distance from the nucleus as 50 pm, you could draw a circle representing that boundary as r = 50pm. You could do the same with an infinite amount of distances from the nucleus and have the same result.

Basically I'm confused as to how/why the boundary is chosen -- does the probability density need to go beneath a certain value for the boundary to be defined? Or is it arbitrary? If r < infinity, there's a finite probability of finding an electron at that distance. So doesn't this mean that the boundary is pretty meaningless?

Graphically what i mean is:

Typical 1s orbital

Why not:

Typical 1s orbital 2

?

Your help is greatly appreciated :D

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

You are right: the outer boundary is quite arbitrary. There is no any intrinsic threshold; the probability just gradually decreases lower and lower, but never reaches 0. You may draw a sphere so as to have the electron inside with 90% probability, or 95%, or 99%, or any other value as you see fit.

This, in particular, is the reason why atomic radii are somewhat arbitrary too.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.