# Why are the C-C bonds in benzene closer in length to double bonds than single bonds?

The $\ce{C-C}$ bonds in benzene are $\mathrm{140~pm}$ long which puts them in between single bonds and double bonds (given at $\mathrm{147-154~pm}$ and $\ce{134-135~pm}$ respectively, sourced from here and here) as expected. However, since the two resonance structures for benzene contribute equally, leading to six identical bonds, one might expect that the bond lengths would be exactly intermediate between a single and a double bond, but in fact the bond lengths seem to be closer to a double bond than a single bond. Why is this the case? My teacher asked me this a while ago when I was preparing for university interviews and I have never thought of a satisfactory answer.

• The "single" bonds in benzene involve the overlap of $\ce{sp^2-sp^2}$ orbitals, whereas alkane single bonds involve the overlap of $\ce{sp^3-sp^3}$ orbitals. This leads to the former bonds being shorter.
– ron
Sep 21, 2015 at 17:45
• Extending my earlier comment, the single bond length in 1,3-butadiene is around 145 pm ( presumably the bond would be a bit longer if we eliminated the resonance overlap between the 2 double bonds by placing butadiene in a conformation where the 2 double bonds are oriented 90° to one another). So the benzene bond length is more or less in between an $\ce{sp^2-sp^2}$ single bond (butadiene, 145 pm) and an $\ce{sp^2-sp^2}$ double bond (135 pm).
– ron
Sep 21, 2015 at 18:05
• Butadiene is a questionable system, as it includes some amount of conjugation. Cyclooctatetraene is a bit more relevant. It gives 1.47 for single bond and 1.33 for double bond, while definitely no having any significant conjugation. Sep 21, 2015 at 18:44
• chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/37688/…
– user122997
Apr 4 at 5:13

one might expect that the bond lengths would be exactly intermediate between a single and a double bond

They actually are. The relevant reference structure, that can provide us lengths of single and double bond for $sp^2$ carbons with not conjugation involved is cyclooctatetraene. The article on the X-ray structure of cycloocta-1,3,5,7-tetrene gives lengths 1.47 and 1.33 angstrom, with their average (1.40) being the exactly value of C-C bond in benzene you provided.

Why should they be bang in the middle? Or to better phrase the question: What reasoning are you applying to assume an averaged bond length?

Bonds don’t work as we laymen like to write them, with either a single line or a double line; and a double line being equivalent to two single lines. Rather, bonds — and most importantly, their lengths — are the result of equilibrated forces: The repulsion of two atoms pushing them apart and the bond-forming energy drawing them together.

Most notably, a double bond is not shorter than a single bond because more or less or whatever energy is involved, but because the molecular orbitals are best (i.e. lowest energy) at that particular length.

When comparing the aromatic benzene bonds to single or double bonds, we have to notice:

• benzene’s carbons are sp² hybridised while single bonds’ carbons are sp³
• there is a significant $$\pi$$-bonding across the benzene ring still happening, even though that amounts to only $$0.5$$ additional bond order.

Therefore, benzene’s bonds are much closer to double bonds in nature by the orbitals forming them. It is only reasonable that the resulting bond length is closer to that of double bonds than that of single bonds.

Remember finally, that ‘bond order’ is only a concept counting bonding and anti-bonding electrons. So even formal single bonds could be much shorter than expected (even though I do not have an example on me at the moment).