Why is the hydrogen electrode used as the reference to set electrode potentials? Could any other element be used instead?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ That's simply for convenience. Any other reference point would do just as well. But we live in a world full of hydrogen (in the form of water), so this is our primary interest. $\endgroup$ Sep 15, 2015 at 18:42
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It's worth noting that I've been told (by a couple of battery researchers) that the silver chloride electrode is the de-facto reference in most labs. It comes in a convenient package which doesn't require you to bubble a gas at 1 bar over a catalyst in a 1M acid (all of which would have to be re-calibrated every time you ran an experiment) $\endgroup$
    – chipbuster
    Sep 15, 2015 at 20:12

2 Answers 2


There are two separate issues here. The first one is defining a zero for potential. In theoretical physics, it is the energy of two charges separated by infinity distance.

In electrochemistry, this is chosen to be the potential of the hydrogen electrode since that is something that can be made reproducibly and hydrogen was the de facto 'zero' for a number of other quantities.

These days, there are much more practical and easy to use reference electrodes like the silver/silver chloride (as chipbuster mentioned) or the saturated calomel or the mercury/mercurous sulfate. Here is a good list of them from a manufacturer of such electrodes: http://www.koslow.com/select_reference_probe

Full disclosure: I used to work for a company that resells electrodes from Koslow.


There are different approaching points here. One is history: The hydrogen electrode has been used forever and people are used to defining values relative to it, so why not continue?

A second point of approach is the following: You cannot measure absolute potentials; you need some kind of a reference. The choice was completely arbitrary. However, there are some ‘rationalisations’ (that probably only turned up after hydrogen was already used):

  • Hydrogen is the first element in the periodic system. It is nice to have ‘number one’ as your reference.

  • The potential of hydrogen (hydrogen gas at 1 bar in an acidic solution of pH 0) is approximately equivalent to that encountered in 1 molar acidic solutions (sulphuric, hydrochloric, nitric acid etc.). Probably even predating the selection of hydrogen, metals that dissolved in 1 molar acid were termed non-noble and those that resisted the acid were noble. Using the hydrogen potential as a zero-point, the non-noble metals have a negative standard potential while noble ones have a positive. An easy way to distinguish noble metals just by a number.

But just to restate: The choice of the electrode as a standard was likely before the second implication was fully realised.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.