3
$\begingroup$

The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that: $$\Delta x\Delta p_x\ge\frac12\hbar$$ But more generally for operators $A$ and $B$: $$\Delta A\Delta B=\frac12|\langle[A,B]\rangle|$$ However, $[x,p_x]=i\hbar$. With this information, I don't see how to get from the second equation to the first.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What you think you'll get upon this trivial substitution if not $1/2 \hbar$? What's your result? $\endgroup$ – Wildcat Sep 13 '15 at 13:06
4
$\begingroup$

The commutator $[\hat{A}, \hat{B}]$ of two operators $\hat{A}$ and $\hat{B}$ is also an operator, so when using the Robertson uncertainty relation we have to take the expectation value of the commutator first and then take the absolute value of it.

But for $\hat{x}$ and $\hat{p}$ the commutator $[\hat{x}, \hat{p}]$ is simply a constant $\mathrm{i} \hbar$, so that taking the expectation value is trivial: $\langle [\hat{x}, \hat{p}] \rangle = \mathrm{i} \hbar$. Then we take the absolute value of this result which is $\hbar$ and divide it by two to get $\frac{1}{2} \hbar$ as expected.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think that perhaps I am being stupid but why is the absolute value of $i\hbar$ equal to $\hbar$? $\endgroup$ – RobChem Sep 13 '15 at 13:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The absolute value of a complex number goes as the square root of (the complex number multiplied by the complex conjugate of the complex number), or $\hbar = \sqrt{i\hbar\cdot -i\hbar}$ in this case. $\endgroup$ – Todd Minehardt Sep 13 '15 at 13:53
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @RobChem, the absolute value of $\mathrm{i} \hbar$ is $\hbar$ by the very definition of the absolute value of a complex number. $\endgroup$ – Wildcat Sep 13 '15 at 13:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.