How to find the number of stereoisomers of a tetra-substituted allenes, exhibiting both axial and central chirality?

I need a reliable method for determining the number of diastereomers and enantiomeric pairs of the following series of compounds bearing in mind that the substituent groups A are chiral on their own (exhibiting central chirality).

There are two planes of interest bisecting the allene sistem, the one constains the left A groups, the other is orthogonal to it. If two A groups are to be reflected through one plane (so it becomes a symmetry plane) their configuration must be different. That is all regarding the central chirality, but I don't know how to include axial chirality in this description (so I don't count one stereoisomer twice).

I think that these are the four diastereomers. Instead of A, I wrote the configuration of A (R/S). Now, as R and S are connected with a mirror plane, diastereomers 2 and 4 shouldn't exhibit axial chirality, as R and S can be regarded as same substituents on one side of the allene system (because of the mirror plane). That's why the third diastereomer exhibits axial chirality (P/M). I am not sure whether my reasoning is correct. The rest beats me. The answer should be 4 diastereomers and 3 enantiomeric pairs (last page), but how?

• The groups A may differ in, and only in, stereo configuration ‘R’ or ‘S’?
– user7951
Sep 5, 2015 at 11:45
• The only method that I am aware of is to draw and compare the various possibilities.
– ron
Sep 5, 2015 at 15:52

Axial and planar are just adjectives we can use to describe what type of chirality a molecule possesses. Usually, just saying the molecule is chiral is good enough. Being planar or axially chiral does not create any new enantiomers or diastereomers compared to if we just said the molecule is chiral.

Let's analyze your problem using standard methods - no special techniques just because the molecule happens to be axially chiral.

I get the same 4 diastereomers that you've drawn above (good job!). When analyzing allene stereochemistry I've always found it convenient to analyze them using Newman projections. I've redrawn the 4 diastereomers below using Newman projections.

In the top diastereomer, all 4 chiral substituents are the same; the molecule has a non-superimposable mirror image (enantiomer). Therefore this diastereomer is chiral.

In the second diastereomer, 3 chiral substituents are the same, one is different; again, the molecule has a non-superimposable mirror image (enantiomer). This diastereomer is also chiral.

In the third diastereomer, two chiral substituents with different chirality are attached to the same carbon; again, the molecule has a non-superimposable mirror image (enantiomer). This diastereomer is also chiral.

In the fourth diastereomer, two chiral substituents with the same chirality are attached to the same carbon. This diastereomer belongs to the interesting point group $\ce{S_4}$. I say interesting because this point group does not contain a $\ce{\sigma}$ plane, but is still nondissymmetric (achiral). Look at my Newman projection for this diastereomer and picture it lying behind the plane of the screen. Reflect it in the plane of the screen and then rotate it 90° (n=4, 360/4 = 90°) and you have recreated the original molecule. This molecule is achiral (all molecules belong to point group $\mathrm{S}_n$ [n is an even integer] are achiral).

So what do we wind up with? 4 diastereomers, 3 of which are chiral (enantiomeric pairs) and one is achiral.

• Now when I think, P or M couldn't even be assigned to thee molecules.
– EJC
Sep 6, 2015 at 7:57
• Maybe it could be assigned for the third diastereomer only (R has higher priority than S). So the third diastereomer is the only axially chiral one, but it is complement to the central chirality (the same pair of enantiomers arises from both)?
– EJC
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:17
• Definition: "An axis about which a set of ligands is held so that it results in a spatial arrangement which is not superposable on its mirror image" - therefore each of the 3 chiral allenes is axially chiral.
– ron
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:27
• Now I got confused. Firstly, there is no way to assign P or M notation for the other diastereomers. Secondly, The allene in my second question gave rise to a diastereomer by axial chirallity, while here it is not the case.
– EJC
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:30
• See the example here The front is always ranked 1,2, the back is always ranked 3,4. Note in the example Cl > OH, but still Cl = 3 because it is in back.
– ron
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:37