For relatively high concentrations of $\ce{HCl}$, I usually just assume that $[\ce{H+}] = [\ce{HCl}]$, because $\ce{HCl}$ is a strong acid and is completely ionized in solution. By taking the negative logarithm of the concentration of $\ce{[H+]}$, the pH comes out more or less correctly.

However, at very low concentrations, this method doesn't work out so well, because water has an amount of auto-ionization, which is described by $K_\mathrm{w} = 10^{-14}$. My old method was just to say that

$$[\ce{H+}] = [\ce{HCl}] + \pu{10^-7 mol dm-3},$$

to include the auto-ionization of water in my calculations. I can't really describe why, but I believe this method to be wrong, because the number $\ce{10^{-7}}$ comes from water just by itself, not with $\ce{HCl}$ added to it.

Then I came across this website, which implies that the above method is an OK method, but mentions that "However, that more complex technique will not be discussed here.". What is that 'more complex technique', and how could I use it?


At first you have to think of where the protons come from. That is as you mentioned it, hydrochloric acid (for every chloride ion in solution there has to be a proton) and water (for every hydroxide ion from the autoprotolysis there also has to be a proton). $$\ce{[H+] = [OH-] + [Cl-]}$$

The concentration for the hydroxide ions can be derived from the autoprotolysis of water, as I've said before. $$k_\mathrm w = \ce{[H+]~[OH-]} \Rightarrow \ce{[OH-]}=\frac{k_\mathrm w}{\ce{[H+]}}$$

Using some funny math, one can find out, that the concentration of the chloride ions in solution can be described the following eqation. Recognizing shortly after that the hard way was not necessary yields to the simplification that hydrochloric acid is completely dissociated. $$\ce{[Cl-]} = \frac{\ce{[HCl]0}~k_\mathrm a}{\ce{[H+]} + k_\mathrm a} \xrightarrow{k_\mathrm a \gg \ce{[H+]~~}} \frac{\ce{[HCl]0}~k_\mathrm a}{k_\mathrm a} = \ce{[HCl]0}~(=c_0)$$

This changes the first equation to be like $$\ce{[H+]} = \frac{k_\mathrm w}{\ce{[H+]}} + c_0$$

Rearranging everything gives you a second order equation in $\ce{[H+]}~(=x)$ $$x^2-c_0~x-k_\mathrm w = 0$$ Wherefrom you get two solutions (from which only the positive one makes sense): $$x = \frac{c_0}{2} + \sqrt{\frac{c_0^2}{4}+k_\mathrm w}$$

Let's compare this solution to your mentioned version. The following graph shows you the difference between both assumptions as $$\operatorname{abs}(f_1(c)-f_2(c))$$

$\hskip3.5cm$enter image description here

A maximum difference of 0.1 pH between the easier and the "more complex" version is acceptable.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The gist is that assuming that any HCl added will completely dissociate in less than 1 molar solution is absolutely reasonable. If $x$ moles of HCl are added the the autoionization equilibrium is shifted such that $$x = \ce{[H^+] -[OH^-]}$$ $\endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Jan 22 '17 at 21:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Would anyone be able to show where the expression for $$\ce{[Cl-]=\frac{[HCl]_0K_a}{[H+] + K_a}}$$ comes from? $\endgroup$
    – H.Linkhorn
    Apr 11 '19 at 19:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.