# Why does hyperconjugation help for ring cleavage?

The question was to rationalize it the ring cleavage happens concerted or non-concerted.

The papers "The Mechanism of the Thermal Decomposition of 1-Pyrazolines and Its Relationship to Cyclopropane Isomerizations" (Crawford 1965/1966; Original papers: here and here) have shown the loss of $\ce{N_2}$ is supposed to be concerted.

I think the C-C/C-D(H) bonds of the central position of the ring are involved in a hyperconjugative fashion, so its hybridization does matter. The out-of-phase linear combination of the $\sigma^\star$ orbitals looks like a p-orbital, therefore I expect a through-space interaction.

I've drawn the the out-of-phase combination as following:

Now my problem is, that I don't see why the out-of-phase combination is involved in hyperconjugation, because I think the overlap is best in the educt, less good in the transition state and has no orbital overlap to the product because the out-of-phase $p$ orbital is kind of perpendicular to the $sp$ Walsh orbitals which lies in the C-C-C plane.

How can hyperconjugation help to understand the observed kinetic isotope effect results?

Summary:

• How does the FMO picture (HOMO-LUMO) with all involved bonds for hyperconjugation looks like?
• Can the ratio 66%:34% be explained?

• What does reactant 3 make compared to 2?

• How can the ratio 1.07/1.20 be explained?

Do you have any ideas?

• Maybe these could help:Article1, Article2 – Mikael Jumppanen Aug 29 '15 at 20:03
• That refers to this question: chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/20405/… – EJC Nov 29 '15 at 18:02
• A couple of questions. First, why do you think that hyperconjugation matters here in the first place? And secondly, what this 'trick' of making linear combination of MOs is all about? Honestly, this is the first time I encounter linear combination of molecular orbitals. I mean, is this even legal? :D – Wildcat Sep 25 '16 at 16:33