Why is $\ce{HNO3}$ a stronger oxidising agent than $\ce{H3PO4}$? $\ce{N}$ and $\ce{P}$ have the same oxidation number. Is it the electronegativity difference between $\ce{N}$ and $\ce{P}$?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Do you think the electronegativity of N helps? N: 3.04 while P: 2.19. $\endgroup$ – Huy Nguyen Jun 6 '15 at 22:15
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, may be. N atoms accept electrons more easily than P atoms, and this can affect his reduction potential. But I'm not sure, the difference in electronegativity is not that big to explain the huge difference in reduction potentials. $\endgroup$ – Ragnar Jun 6 '15 at 23:32
  • $\begingroup$ related chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/30863/… $\endgroup$ – Mithoron Jun 7 '15 at 13:46

Let me create background first. Oxidizing agents are the chemical that helps something else oxidize and itself gets reduced.(reduction in charge)

$\ce{N}$ in $\ce{HNO3}$ is in the +5 oxidation state - how do we know that? $\ce{H}$ is +1, $\ce{O}$ is -2 and the overall $\ce{HNO3}$ has a zero net charge. The same goes for $\ce{H3PO4}$ resulting in +5 oxidation state of $\ce{P}$.

That +5 is the highest common oxidation state for $\ce{N}$. If $\ce{N}$ is reduced to say +4 as in $\ce{NO2}$ or +2 in $\ce{NO}$, it's charge is reduced and $\ce{N}$ is therefore an oxidizing agent for that particular reaction

So, $\ce{HNO3}$ is an strong oxidizing agent because the $\ce{N}$ can be readily reduced.

But $\ce{H3PO4}$ is a poor oxidizing agent. Here are two basic reasons:

  1. Nitrogen does not possess $d$-orbitals in valence shell and so its covalency is limited to 4. $\ce{N}$ can however achieve a formal oxidation state of +5 as in the $\ce{NO3-}$ ion. The inability of $\ce{N}$ to unpair and promote its $2s$ electron results in that $\ce{N(+5)}$ is less stable than $\ce{N(+3)}$. However, $\ce{P(+5)}$ is more stable than $\ce{P(+3)}$ and phosphoric acid shows less oxidising properties.

  2. The affinity of phosphorus for oxygen is greater than that of nitrogen; as a result, phosphonic acid ($\ce{H3PO3}$) is good reducing agent.

    $\ce{H3PO4 + 2H+ + 2e-> H3PO3 + H2O}$; $E=-0.276 \ce{V}$

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much, now I get it. I didn't think of the contribution of d-orbitals in P. $\endgroup$ – Ragnar Jun 7 '15 at 23:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, there is no need to bring hypothetical d-orbitals of phosphorus into the game. Electronegativity of the two elements, compared with that of oxygen is enough. $\endgroup$ – Jan Jun 8 '15 at 1:06

Frost Diagrams explain it very nicely as well. Look at the G/F = zE/V, very positive for HNO3, which makes it a potent oxidizing agent (much less stable). H3PO4 is basically the complete opposite.

As you can see, the G/F=zE/V for HNO3 is very positive, making it a potent oxidizing agent, and much less stable.

enter image description here


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.