# Predicting relative solubilites of salts without Ksp values

Is there a way of comparing which salt is more soluble without knowing their $K_{sp}$ data or performing experiments?

For example, comparing $\ce{Hg2Cl2}$ and $\ce{Cr2(SO4)3}$.

I am not sure but can I compare lattice and hydration energy relatively or the ion size and estimate?

Experiments will give concrete results but I was wondering if there is another method just to gauge the solubility.

• As I mentioned in chat, I feel one of more thorough and reliable ways to answer this question is actually start off by calculating the solubilities for a large amount of binary salts from $\mathrm{K_{sp}}$ data, then compare how each cation/anion correlates to solubility individually. The calculations themselves are trivial, the trick is in plotting the data without it being a mess! May 26 '15 at 17:11
• I believe someone has to have done an experiment at one time. Even if you look at lattice energies and hydration energies, somebody must have measured these... yet the question remains, what is the theoretical (mathematical) connection between these values. May 27 '15 at 5:59
• Maybe an application of Pearson's hard and soft acids and bases concept would help here? Jun 13 '15 at 12:04
• If you were comparing salts like AgCl , AgBr , AgI then you could use polarization and Fajan's Rules to qualitatively compare their solubility Oct 25 '16 at 13:19

To a certain extent, you can predict the relative solubilities of two salts, especially when there is a large difference in solubility. The existing answer mentions Fajans' rules and obviously it is quite easy to predict which of $\ce{NaCl}$ and $\ce{AgI}$ is more soluble.

But I'm inclined to be pessimistic and say no, this is not generally applicable.

You're perhaps on the right track. The dissolution of the salt arises from a couple of measurable quantities: the lattice enthalpy of the salt, and hydration enthalpies of the ions. You could measure both, and try to come up with a trend.

However that's often far easier said than done. The trends are sometimes quite subtle, and even if you have all the relevant data and limit yourself to a "simple" system like the alkali metal halides, you'll find that the interplay between two factors leads to a very delicate balance, and the resulting trend is quite complex. I don't think it's something that we can predict solely in our heads without doing any measurements.

For example, if you simply compare $\ce{NaF}$ and $\ce{NaI}$, $\ce{NaI}$ has a smaller lattice enthalpy (favours dissolution) but the $\ce{I-}$ ion also has a smaller hydration enthalpy (disfavours dissolution). So which factor wins out? There's no simple heuristic or rule of thumb that applies here, not any that I know of, at least.

How about two obviously more different salts? Let's try $\ce{NaF}$ and $\ce{MgF2}$. $\ce{NaF}$ has a smaller lattice enthalpy (favours dissolution) but also the sum of the hydration enthalpies is smaller than $\ce{MgF2}$ (more ions and $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is more charged than $\ce{Na+}$ - which disfavours dissolution of $\ce{NaF}$). Again we have the same dilemma.

In fact, that's just the enthalpic changes, so only half the story. There's also entropy to care about, which can either be positive or negative (and it's extremely difficult to predict this!).

Like dissolve like. Thus, a more ionic compound would be more soluble in water and a covalent one would be more soluble in organic solvents. Speaking in context of your example, and assuming solvent to be water, The nucleus of Cr3+ ion attracts the bond pair electrons more strongly for its greater charge & smaller diameter than $$\ce{Hg+}$$ ion. According to Fajans' rules, Cr2(SO4)3 is of more covalent character than Hg2Cl2. Again the factor of anion is less significant here as oxygen & chlorine are quite closer in their electronegativity. So, from that point of view Hg2Cl2 has better solubility than Cr2(SO4)3.

• Certainly an interesting starting point, but I believe the OP just named those two compounds as an example and is actually looking for a conceptual approach to the underlying problem. May 27 '15 at 5:56