In many places I've seen the "extra" bond in benzyne being labelled as $\ce{sp^2-sp^2}$ overlap or distorted (not parallel) $\ce{p\pi-p\pi}$ overlap. But I've failed to see why we can't have a normal, parallel $\ce{p\pi-p\pi}$ overlap.

Wikipedia says:

In benzyne, however, the p orbitals are distorted to accommodate the triple bond within the ring system, reducing their effective overlap.

That makes no sense to me — why can't a normal, parallel $\ce{p\pi-p\pi}$ overlap be "accommodated" within the system.

So, what is the reason for the distorted $\pi$ bond in benzyne?

I'm fine with answers involving a bit of QM/MO theory.


1 Answer 1


First, Wikipedia doesn't really say what is the extent of this change. Here are superimposed a benzene and a benzyne molecule (own HF calculation, don't ask for the details):

enter image description here

The carbon atoms involved in the triple bond are displaced by less than $\pu{0.2 Å}$. In benzene, we have with this level of calculation:

  • $\ce{C–C}$ distance = $\pu{1.39 Å}$
  • $\ce{C–H}$ distance = $\pu{1.08 Å}$
  • $\ce{C–C–C}$ angle = $120^\circ$

while in benzyne, we have:

  • $\ce{C–C}$ triple bond = $\pu{1.22 Å}$
  • other $\ce{C–C}$ bonds = $\pu{1.38 Å}$ (almost all equal)

So, merely because the triple bond is stronger, the distance will be shorted and the benzyne structure is distorted.

Regarding orbitals, well, the p orbitals of the carbon atoms involved in the triple bond are “naturally” directed towards where the hydrogens would be. Slightly distortion of the system is possible, and indeed evidence above on the structure, but they will not be parallel, as that would disrupt the structure too much and diminish the $\sigma$ bond. So it's a competition between: making the new p orbitals “more parallel” increases overlap, but it weakens the $\sigma$ bonding pattern, which is much stronger. As such, while some distortion happens, you stay mostly close to the benzene-type orbitals.

  • $\begingroup$ "disrupt the structure"--that's what I sort of wanted to know.. But I think I got it--basically the rest of the ring would have to distort and that's a Very Bad Thing, right? (I'm going to wait a while before accepting this, let others answer) $\endgroup$ May 8, 2012 at 13:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.