6
$\begingroup$

I was once told on this site that it was incorrect form to use units that specify the chemical being referred to in dimensional analysis. For example:

$$150.~\mathrm{g}~~\ce{KNO3} \cdot \frac{1~\mathrm{mol}~~\ce{KNO3}}{101.103~\mathrm{g}~~\ce{KNO3}} \cdot{} \frac{1~\mathrm{mol}~~\ce{C7H4O}}{6~\mathrm{mol}~~\ce{KNO3}} \cdot \frac{104.106~\mathrm{g}~~\ce{C7H4O}}{1~\mathrm{mol}~~\ce{C7H4O}}=25.7~\mathrm{g}~~\ce{C7H4O}$$

This is the way I learned it, and I feel that this clears up confusion that might otherwise arise when from performing such a calculation.

My overall question is: is it acceptable to do dimensional analysis as I presented it? If not, please explain why it is not correct to do it this way and show me what I should be doing instead.

$\endgroup$

migrated from chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com May 2 '15 at 3:05

This question came from our discussion, support, and feature requests site for scientists, academics, teachers, and students in the field of chemistry.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I don't understand what is contentious. Everything you did is perfectly fine in my eyes. I don't know exactly what chemical you mean by C7H4O, but that's irrelevant. If there is such a chemical, and it reacts with nitrate salts, everything you calculated is fine. $\endgroup$ – Curt F. May 2 '15 at 3:22
1
$\begingroup$

The way I would perform the dimensional analysis you give in your question would be slightly different. That is mainly due to the fact that I don't consider chemical names or formulae as units, but as designators.

As an aside, I think you were starting from a question like the following:

How much $\ce{C7H4O}$ would you have to weigh in for it to fully react with $150~\mathrm{g}$ of $\ce{KNO3}$ if the reaction is described by the following equation? $$ \ce{C7H4O + 6KNO3 -> Fumes^ + Tar} $$

The result is $m_{\ce{C7H4O}}$, given is $m_{\ce{KNO3}} = 150~\mathrm{g}$.

The amount of $\ce{C7H4O}$ used per $\ce{KNO3}$ is $$|\nu_{\ce{C7H4O}} / \nu_{\ce{KNO3}}| = \frac{1}{6}$$

As such, the result is composed as follows: $$\begin{align} n_{\ce{C7H4O}} &= \frac{1}{6} n_{\ce{KNO3}} \\ \tag{$n=m/M$}\frac{m_{\ce{C7H4O}}}{M_{\ce{C7H4O}}} &= \frac{1}{6} \frac{m_{\ce{KNO3}}}{M_{\ce{KNO3}}} \\ \hline m_{\ce{C7H4O}} &= \frac{1}{6} \frac{m_{\ce{KNO3}}}{M_{\ce{KNO3}}} M_{\ce{C7H4O}} \end{align}$$

If we now apply dimension analysis to what we think is the result, we can very quickly see how the two molar masses cancel each others units out and only the mass of $\ce{KNO3}$ remains to give the right hand side of the equation a dimension of $\mathrm{g}$. As the only symbol left on the left hand side is a $m$ we know that it needs a dimension $\mathrm{g}$ and as such we can happily plug in the numbers into our calculator for the result.

Frankly, I am so used to "my" method that I had to look at your example quite closely to see what was actually going on. To me that method just seems unwieldy, as you clutter up equation space with chemical formulae.

That being said; find the method that works the best for you (meaning it is robust enough to also solve your chemical engineering, biology and other problems using dimensional analysis) and stick to it.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.