I previously asked a question about a CIF file here (namely CIF fields that are available for some atoms, but not others) I think I have the answer (namely to place dots [.] at places where the two missing terms would normally appear), although I felt I'd wait to see if anyone answers in case I am wrong. Presently I have this CIF file:
#=====================================================================
# X-ray crystallography data from Pharma Res, 1995
#---------------------------------------------------------------------
data_methylphenidate
_cell_length_a 9.401(3)
_cell_length_b 7.3053(7)
_cell_length_c 11.113(3)
_cell_angle_alpha 90
_cell_angle_beta 109.260(2)
_cell_angle_gamma 90
_cell_formula_units_Z 2
_cell_volume 720.5(3)
_cell_measurement_temperature 295.15
_cell_measurement_reflns_used 1797
_chemical_formula_sum 'C14 H20 Cl N O2'
_chemical_formula_weight 269.77
_chemical_name_systematic 'methyl (2S)-2-phenyl-2-[(2S)-piperidin-2-yl]acetate;hydrochloride'
_chemical_identifier_inchi 'InChI=1S/C14H19NO2.ClH/c1-17-14(16)13(11-7-3-2-4-8-11)12-9-5-6-10-15-12;/h2-4,7-8,12-13,15H,5-6,9-10H2,1H3;1H/t12-,13-;/m0./s1'
_chemical_identifier_inchi_key 'JUMYIBMBTDDLNG-QNTKWALQSA-N'
_refine_ls_R_factor_gt 0.070
_space_group_crystal_system monoclinic
_space_group_name_H-M_alt 'P 21'
_space_group_IT_number 4
loop_
_symmetry_equiv_pos_as_xyz
'x, y, z'
'-x, y+1/2, -z'
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_chemical_conn_number
_atom_site_cartn_x
_atom_site_cartn_y
_atom_site_cartn_z
_atom_site_adp_type
_atom_site_B_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_type_symbol
N1 1 -0.8852(9) 0.120(1) -1.0300(8) Biso 3.1(2) N
H1a 2 -0.965 0.0850 -1.001 . . H
H1b 3 -0.880 -0.080 -1.033 . . H
C2 4 -0.739(1) 0.049(2) -0.940(1) Biso 3.9(2) C
H2 5 -0.746 -0.080 -0.936 . . H
C3 6 -0.614(1) 0.092(1) -0.988(1) Biso 5.1(3) C
H3a 7 -0.525 0.0380 -0.933 . . H
H3b 8 -0.603 0.2210 -0.990 . . H
C4 9 -0.640(1) 0.021(2) -1.122(1) Biso 5.0(3) C
H4a 10 -0.639 -0.110 -1.119 . . H
H4b 11 -0.561 0.0640 -1.150 . . H
C5 12 -0.792(2) 0.086(1) -1.213(1) Biso 5.3(3) C
H5a 13 -0.786 0.2150 -1.225 . . H
H5b 14 -0.812 0.0250 -1.291 . . H
C6 15 -0.915(1) 0.049(2) -1.160(1) Biso 4.3(2) C
H6a 16 -1.004 0.1050 -1.214 . . H
H6b 17 -0.928 -0.080 -1.159 . . H
C7 18 -0.721(1) 0.124(1) -0.809(1) Biso 3.3(2) C
H7 19 -0.737 0.2520 -0.817 . . H
C8 20 -0.834(1) 0.051(2) -0.7527(9) Biso 3.8(2) C
O9 21 -0.889(1) 0.172(1) -0.6908(9) Biso 4.9(2) O
C10 22 -0.998(2) 0.113(2) -0.634(1) Biso 5.8(4) C
H10a 23 -1.028 0.2150 -0.594 . . H
H10b 24 -0.956 0.0210 -0.572 . . H
H10c 25 -1.085 0.0650 -0.698 . . H
C11 26 -0.563(1) 0.093(1) -0.709(1) Biso 3.9(3) C
C12 27 -0.509(2) -0.091(2) -0.681(1) Biso 5.6(3) C
H12 28 -0.566 -0.192 -0.726 . . H
C13 29 -0.376(2) -0.114(3) -0.590(2) Biso 7.2(4) C
H13 30 -0.343 -0.238 -0.572 . . H
C14 31 -0.290(2) 0.009(6) -0.522(2) Biso 11.3(8) C
H14 32 -0.1960 -0.018 -0.460 . . H
C15 33 -0.343(2) 0.204(4) -0.548(2) Biso 9.0(6) C
H15 34 -0.284 0.3020 -0.501 . . H
C16 35 -0.479(2) 0.242(2) -0.643(1) Biso 5.9(3) C
H16 36 -0.515 0.3640 -0.664 . . H
O3 37 -0.871(1) -0.1124(9) -0.7590(9) Biso 5.7(2) O
Cl 38 -0.8105(3) 0.5484 -1.0089(3) Biso 4.72(6) Cl
. The problem is that Avogadro and enCIFer are having trouble rendering it and I don't see what the problem is. e.g., this is what Avogadro is giving me at the moment:
Are _cell_measurement_theta_min
and _cell_measurement_theta_max
the problem (namely that I haven't specified them)?