11
$\begingroup$

I'm reading a review article on photocatalytic water splitting (using semiconductors) and I came across the following:

"To achieve photocatalytic water splitting using a single photocatalyst, the bandgap of the semiconductor must straddle the reduction and oxidation potentials of water, which are +0 and +1.23 V vs the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) at pH =0".

I have a few questions about this statement:

  1. What exactly does it mean when you say that the bandgap has to "straddle" the reduction and oxidation potentials? Does it mean that you need an electron/hole with energy at least equal to 1.23 eV for oxidation/reduction to take place. So, the bandgap has to be greater than 1.23 eV in order to ensure that. Is my understanding accurate?

  2. When using a single photocatalyst, I assume the oxygen and hydrogen evolution take place on the same material. If you had separate oxygen evolution and hydrogen evolution catalysts, what would the condition on the bandgaps of these semiconductors be?

Thanks! Sorry if these questions are too basic, I have little training in chemistry.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The original purported advantage of semiconductor|liquid junctions proposed by those in the field of photoelectrochemistry arose from the hypothesis that charge carriers would have a shorter distance to travel than in solid-state photovoltaic systems, thereby allowing lower quality materials to be used in an integrated solar energy system and still achieve high conversion efficiencies. In theory, one would also be able to avoid forming metallurgical junctions, say those p-n junctions made by using different dopants and creating a well-defined interface to separate charge carriers. Instead of forming these solid-state structures, you can define the electric field by selecting a suitable redox couple in solution. The specific energetics of the semiconductor and redox couple will then define the maximum power obtainable from the given system, so this is why the valence band must be below the energy of the OER and the conduction band above the energy level corresponding to the HER. By natural induction, this means that the bandgap must meet or exceed 1.23 eV, but this is only a thermodynamic constraint.

In reality your system’s bandgap must actually exceed 2.0 eV, this is due to the kinetic constraints based in part on the OER (and to a lesser extent the HER ) and losses encountered within the light absorber. Of course, for a single light absorber there is a tradeoff between the percentage of utilized solar flux and the bandgap.

This explains why many efforts are focused on using dual light absorbers, with one dedicated to the anode and another for the cathode. In this tandem structure they can efficiently utilize more of the solar spectrum. If you were to stack these light absorbers and use a 1.2 eV and 1.8 eV materials (with each one carrying out one of the two half-reactions required to split water), you could in theory get twice the efficiency compared to a single absorber with a bandgap of 2.2 eV.

Now are these semiconductor|liquid junctions going to beat a dedicated photovoltaic solar panel/electrolyzer any time soon? Maybe, but probably not. Is water splitting really worth doing? Maybe, but probably not. Is it a beautiful idea? Definitely.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.