6
$\begingroup$

The energy band of valence electrons gets smaller and smaller when the lattice (bulk) atoms are more and more separated from each other, until discrete energy levels are formed, due to the isolation of the atoms from each other (see image below).

What happens with energy levels of core electrons in the bulk, as the lattice constant is changed? Do they form a continuous energy band in the first place? Why?

Diamond band structure vs. lattice constant (source)

If core electrons form a continuous energy band, how come K,L,M,... shells are differentiable in xray spectroscopy? In other words, if all electrons form one continuous band, how can xray have element specificity?

Electron shells (source)

| improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

What happens with energy levels of core electrons in the bulk, as the lattice constant is changed? Do they form a continuous energy band in the first place? Why?

Using an organic example, as you move from ethylene to butadiene to hexatriene, you have 1, 2 and 3 bonding and antibonding pi molecular orbitals respectively. If you continue this chain extension and wind up with a very large polyene, the energy difference between all of the bonding (or antibonding) orbitals becomes smaller and smaller. In addition to this compression between energy levels, each molecule is in a slightly different environment. Some are near the surface, some deep in the bulk, some have a structural deviation or packing non-uniformity close by. This serves to broaden the energy width of each orbital. Between the energy broadening of an orbital and the compression of the energy separation between orbitals, one can imagine a limiting case where all of the bonding orbitals are so close to one another that one continuous band, the valence band, exists. The same would be true of the antibonding orbitals and they would merge into a continuous conduction band. The only remaining separation is the separation between the valence band and the conduction band. This separation is referred to as the band gap.

In the real world, at least at normal pressures, this limiting case of a single band comprised of all bonding orbitals seems unlikely. Instead, some orbitals where the energy separation between them is large likely form separate bands. In this case, the HOMO would still broaden significantly (as would the other molecular orbitals) and transform into the valence band, remaining distinct from the other bands at lower energies.

Still, it is difficult to probe the bulk and to understand exactly just what the situation is there. X-ray spectroscopy probes to a depth of only a micron or so, so it is really examining the surface states. Certainly at least some of the molecules at the surface retain their individual orbital identity and are not part of the band structure. Therefore it is not surprising that XPS (since it probes only the surface) can detect individual orbitals and serve to identify materials.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ what does it have to do with core electrons (not valence)? $\endgroup$ – Sparkler Mar 26 '15 at 0:38
  • $\begingroup$ Like I said, all orbitals, including core electrons like the 1s in an atom or the lowest occupied MO in a molecule, will fuzz out and widen into a band that will eventually merge with other nearby bands (like the 2s). As the density of states further increases, all of these bands merge into one continuous band, the valence or conduction band. $\endgroup$ – ron Mar 26 '15 at 2:28
  • $\begingroup$ in light of your answer, could you also explain how come K,L,M,... shells are differentiable in xray spectroscopy? in other words, if all electrons form one continuous band, how can xray have element specificity? $\endgroup$ – Sparkler Mar 27 '15 at 2:23
  • $\begingroup$ It is difficult to know in advance at what level to write an answer. Generally, I try to keep it simple. I've gone back and edited my answer to try and make it more complete. $\endgroup$ – ron Mar 27 '15 at 19:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's the difference between surface and bulk states. $\endgroup$ – ron Mar 28 '15 at 16:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.