5
$\begingroup$

2-Chloro-3,3-dimethylbutane or 3-Chloro-2,2-dimethylbutane?

According to these sources, both are correct:

  1. NIST/TRC Web Thermo Tables (WTT)
  2. ChemSpider

nomenclature discrepancy

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

The current IUPAC recommendations (2013) read as follows:

Numbering

When several structural features appear in cyclic and acylic compounds, low locants are assigned to them in the following decreasing order of seniority.

(…)

(f) detachable alphabetized prefixes, all considered together in a series of increasing numerical order;

(g) lowest locants for the substituent cited first as a prefix in the name;

(…)

Note that Rule f takes precedence over Rule g.

Furthermore,

The lowest set of locants is defined as the set that, when compared term by term with other locant sets, each cited in order of increasing value, has the lowest term at the first point of difference (…)

Therefore, the example is named as 3-chloro-2,2-dimethylbutane rather than 2-chloro-3,3-dimethylbutane since the locant set ‘2,2,3’ is lower than ‘2,3,3’.

3-chloro-2,2-dimethylbutane

|improve this answer|||||
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ but the iupac naming rules also say that if there are 2 substituent groups at the same position in a compound alphabetical priority comes into play!!! $\endgroup$ – Jai Mahajan Mar 25 '15 at 15:29
  • $\begingroup$ @user166748 Alphabetical order is used to establish the order of citation of detachable prefixes (that is why ‘chloro’ is cited before ‘methyl’). For numbering, however, all prefixes are considered together (see item f above). Only when there is a choice between equivalent numberings, the lowest locant is assigned to the substituent cited first as a prefix in the name. $\endgroup$ – Loong Mar 25 '15 at 15:49
  • $\begingroup$ yaa so that means both the names are correct one by locant rule and one by alphabetical priority? sorry for the punctuations $\endgroup$ – Jai Mahajan Mar 25 '15 at 16:49
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ No. First, the alphabetical order is used to establish the order of citation of the prefixes; thus, the name is x-chloro-y,y-dimethylbutane (not x,x-dimethyl-y-chloro-butane). Then, low locants are assigned using Rule f considering all prefixes together; thus, the numbers are 2,2,3 (not 2,3,3). Therefore, the name is 3-chloro-2,2-dimethylbutane and we do not need any further rules. – For example, 2-chloro-3-methylbutane would be a different case, which would also require Rule g (and thus implicitly the alphabetical order of prefixes) in order to assign the numbers. $\endgroup$ – Loong Mar 25 '15 at 17:31
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Loong You should add this last comment into the front of your answer. Reading simple english is much easier than the IUPAC rule book. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Gaurang Tandon Feb 2 '18 at 13:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.