0
$\begingroup$

why chelates which form 3 or 4 member rings or 6 or 7 member rings are as stable as 5 member ring chelates? for example if we measure stability of chelates with oxygen donors, say oxalate, malonate, succinate etc oxalate chelated with metal shoes more stability. why malonate , succinate as chelating ligands are less stable?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Chelating increases the stability , probably due to more change in positive entropy $\endgroup$ – Heisenberg Mar 19 '15 at 7:03
1
$\begingroup$

In its general form, your statement on the stability of these complexes is wrong!

$\ce{Be(II)}$-malonato complexes are more stable than the corresponding oxalato complexes, cf. Preparative, potentiometric and NMR studies of the interaction of beryllium(II) with oxalate and malonate.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ no sir i was not trying to say it was universal, i saw in books that said 5 member ring forming chelates are relatively more stable than 6 member or 7 member or 4 member ring forming chelates. $\endgroup$ – Punarbasu Roy Mar 19 '15 at 14:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.