Spectrum of CO2 at 2349 cm^-1 Spectrum of $\ce{CO2}$ at $2349\space \mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ region

For some other molecules (for example $\ce{CO}$) the peak separation corresponds to $2B$ (where $B$ is the rotational constant wavenumber) However for $\ce{CO2}$ when I calculated the peak separation and compared it to literature value, it seems approximately to equal to $4B$? Any idea why is this?

Also, what is the explanation for $\ce{CO2}$ spectrum being asymmetric? and why does the $P$ branch have larger peak separations than the $R$ branch?


1 Answer 1


(In this answer I am using the symbol $\require{begingroup} \begingroup \newcommand{\tb}[0]{\tilde{B}} \tb$ to represent a wavenumber instead of $B$, which I choose to define as an energy – not that we will be using it.)

Why is the peak separation $4\tb$ instead of $2\tb$?

This has to do with nuclear spin statistics. Because oxygen-16 is a boson (spin 0), the wavefunction of the entire molecule (which comprises translational, rotational, vibrational, electronic, and nuclear spin components) must be symmetric upon exchange of the two oxygen-16 atoms.

The translational component is symmetric, as usual. The electronic ground state is ${}^1\Sigma_\mathrm{g}$, which is totally symmetric. The nuclear spin component must be symmetric by virtue of the fact that both oxygen atoms are spin 0; this means that there is only one possible spin state that they can be in (cf. hydrogen-1 has a spin of 1/2 and two possible spin states). Consequently, exchange of the oxygen atoms leads to no change in the nuclear spin wavefunction.

As a result, this means that the vibrational component times the rotational component must be symmetric; or in other words, the vibrational and rotational components must have the same parity.

Since the peak structure at $\pu{2349 cm-1}$ arises due to the antisymmetric stretch, the vibrational ground state $v = 0$ is symmetric with respect to exchange of oxygen, and must therefore be paired with rotational levels with even $J$, which are likewise symmetric. In a similar manner, the vibrational excited state $v = 1$ is antisymmetric, and must be paired with odd $J$ levels.

In $\ce{CO}$ where there are no nuclear spin statistics at work, the following transitions are all allowed in the $R$-branch ($\Delta J = +1$): $$\begin{align} (v,J) = (0,0) &\to (1,1) & \text{line 1}\\ (0,1) &\to (1,2) & \text{line 2}\\ (0,2) &\to (1,3) & \text{line 3}\\ (0,3) &\to (1,4) & \text{line 4}\\ \end{align}$$

and so on. However, in $\ce{CO2}$ the state $(v,J) = (0,1)$ is not permissible, and hence line 2 does not appear in the spectrum. Similarly, neither does line 4, or line 6, and so on; the separation between adjacent lines is therefore doubled.

Why are the peak separations in the $P$-branch larger than in the $R$-branch?

This is because the rotational constant $\tb_0$ in the vibrational ground state is different from the rotational constant $\tb_1$ in the first vibrational excited state. The rotational energy levels (in wavenumber units) are therefore by:

$$\tilde{G}(v,J) = v\omega_0 + \tb_vJ(J+1)$$

where $\omega_0$ is the wavenumber of the pure vibrational transition (i.e. the band origin). For the transition $(v,J) = (0,J) \to (1,J-1)$ in the $P$-branch, the associated energy is therefore

$$\tilde{P}(J) = \omega_0 + \tb_1J(J-1) - \tb_0J(J+1)$$

The separation between adjacent lines in the $\ce{CO2}$ spectrum is then

$$\begin{align} \tilde{P}(J) - \tilde{P}(J+2) &= \tb_1J(J-1) - \tb_0J(J+1) - \tb_1(J+1)(J+2) + \tb_0(J+2)(J+3) \\ &= 4J(\tb_0 - \tb_1) + 6\tb_0 - 2\tb_1 \end{align}$$

You can easily verify that if $\tb_0 = \tb_1 = \tb$, then this simplifies directly to $4\tb$, as expected.

However, because $\tb_0 \neq \tb_1$, the gap between adjacent lines acquires a $J$-dependency, because the term $(\tb_0 - \tb_1)$ is nonzero. In the case of the asymmetric stretch, it turns out that $\tb_0 > \tb_1$ (can you figure out why? It's best explained using the moment of inertia $I$, since $\tb = \hbar/8\pi cI$). Therefore, as $J$ increases (i.e. as we move farther left along the spectrum), the separation between lines increases.

An exactly analogous calculation will explain why the lines in the $R$-branch tend to "bunch":

$$\tilde{R}(J+2) - \tilde{R}(J) = 4J(\tb_1 - \tb_0) + 6\tb_1 - 2\tb_0$$



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.