In a book, I read two quite contradictory statements.:
$\ce{HIO > HBrO > HClO}$ wrt acidity while
$\ce{HF > HCl > HBr}$.
Aren't they contradictory? If not can anyone please explain the accurate reasoning?
Chemistry Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientists, academics, teachers, and students in the field of chemistry. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityIn a book, I read two quite contradictory statements.:
$\ce{HIO > HBrO > HClO}$ wrt acidity while
$\ce{HF > HCl > HBr}$.
Aren't they contradictory? If not can anyone please explain the accurate reasoning?
$$\ce{HOCl>HOBr>HOI}$$ $\mathrm{p}K_a(\ce{HOCl})=7.5$, $\mathrm{p}K_a(\ce{HOBr})=8.6$, $\mathrm{p}K_a(\ce{HOI})=10.6$
The $\ce{H-O}$ bond in those oxo-acides ionizes more readily when the oxygen atom is bonded to a more electronegative atom.
$$\ce{HI>HBr>HCl\gg HF}$$ $\mathrm{p}K_a(\ce{HF})=3.1$, $\mathrm{p}K_a(\ce{HCl})=-6.0$, $\mathrm{p}K_a(\ce{HBr})=-9.0$, $\mathrm{p}K_a(\ce{HI})=-9.5$
$\ce{HCl}$, $\ce{HBr}$, and $\ce{HI}$ are all strong acids, whereas $\ce{HF}$ is a weak acid.
As halogen size increases (as we move down the periodic table), $\ce{H-X}$ bond strength decreases and acid strength increases (a weaker bond produces a stronger acid, and vice versa).
\mathrm{p}K_a(\ce{...})
.
$\endgroup$
– Martin - マーチン♦
Mar 12 '15 at 9:29
I'm not sure about the first order, but I'll try to explain the reason for the second one. The acidic strength increases as $$\ce{HF<HCl<HBr}$$
One reason is the bond strength between the hydrogen and the halogen atom. Since the bond between $\ce F$ and $\ce H$ is very strong, the molecule does not easily lose $\ce H^+$. On the other hand, as the size of the halogen atom increases, the overlapping of the orbitals between halogen and hydrogen becomes less efficient. Thus, $\ce {Cl}$ and $\ce {Br}$ can more easily lose $\ce {H^+}$ than $\ce {F}$. Hence, the acidic strength increases as size of halogen atom increases.
Second reason is the stability of formation of conjugate base. When an acid loses $\ce {H^+}$ ion, it forms what is called as conjugate base. Similarly, when a base loses $\ce {OH^-}$ ion, it forms a conjugate acid. In case of $\ce {HF}$, we have $$\ce{HF <=> H^+ +F- }$$ Here, $\ce {F^-}$ is the conjugate base. Now, due to small size of $\ce {F}$, it is difficult for $\ce {F-}$ to hold negative charge. There are strong repulsions.
Now, for $\ce {HBr}$, we have $$\ce{HBr <=> H^+ +Br^-}$$
$\ce {Br}$ has a greater atomic radius. It is also less electronegative than $\ce {F}$. Hence, the repulsions are less in $\ce {Br-}$. Thus, $\ce {Br^-}$ is quite stable. The more stable is the conjugate base, the more readily the acid loses $\ce {H^+}$ ion, and so, more is its acidic strength.
Check this link. Maybe you'll find it useful.
<=>
for equilibrium arrows $\ce{<=>}$. If you want to know more, please have a look here and here. Please do not use markup in the title field, see here for details.
$\endgroup$
– Martin - マーチン♦
Mar 12 '15 at 9:37
As Tejas said the sign of inequality in the second statement should be opposite. This is because in HF there is extensive hydrogen bonding which tends to reduce its acidic character. The reason being the high electro negativity of Fluorine. The extent of hydrogen bonding would decrease down the group due to decrease in electro negativity. A similar explanation may also be extended to reason the first one. Your book is definitely incorrect.