The question is the same as the title states. In my text book,the following is written

$\ce{Cr^{2+}}$ gets converted to $\ce{Cr^{3+}}$ as the +3 oxidation state hase half filled $\mathrm{t_2g}$ orbitals - thus it is a good reducing agent, on the other hand $\ce{Mn^{3+}}$ gets ocnverted to $\ce{Mn^{2+}}$ as +2 oxidation stae has half filled $\mathrm{d} $-orbital.

Now my doubt is -

  • Why can't the $\mathrm{t_2g}$ argument be used for $\ce{Mn}$?

  • Why can't the half-filled $\mathrm{d}$-orbital argument be used for $\ce{Cr}$?


Why can't the t2g argument be used for Mn ?

Because the number of t2g electrons is not changing upon going from Mn3+ to Mn2+. In both Mn2+ and Mn3+ there are 3 t2g electrons. I think the point they are trying to make with Cr3+ being half filled is that there are 3 t2g electrons and no eg electrons. Mn3+ and Mn2+ both have eg electrons.

You could make a similar argument for Mn3+ being oxidized to Mn4+, which would have half filled t2g and empty eg.

Why can't the half-filled d-orbital argument be used for Cr?

Because neither Cr3+ nor Cr2+ has a half filled d subshell. Cr3+ has 3 electrons while Cr2+ has 4 electrons.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I was asking why not $\ce{Cr^+}$. $\endgroup$ – Soham Mar 2 '15 at 19:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And actually, $\ce {Cr^2+} $ also has 3 $\ce {t_2g}$ electrons. $\endgroup$ – Soham Mar 2 '15 at 19:13
  • $\begingroup$ would Cr+ be d5 or s1d4? $\endgroup$ – DavePhD Mar 2 '15 at 19:15
  • $\begingroup$ i don't know why it would be s1d4 as d5 would be completely half filled and s is in the outer shell $\endgroup$ – Soham Mar 2 '15 at 19:21
  • $\begingroup$ from slide 16 here: alpha.chem.umb.edu/chemistry/ch371/documents/… it seems like Cr(I) is s1d4 $\endgroup$ – DavePhD Mar 2 '15 at 19:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.