3
$\begingroup$

From my understanding plotting the conc. over time for a 0-order reaction yield a negative linear slope. Plotting conc vs time for a first order reaction intuitively yields an exponential type slope. however, my teacher never covered the looks of a conc vs time graph for a second order reaction. What may this look like. In conjunction, what does it look like when we graph its rate over concentration?

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

Let's take a single-component second-order reaction:

$$\ce{2A -> B}$$

If it is a 2nd-order reaction, the rate will be proportional to the concentration of $A$, squared:

$$\frac{dA}{dt} = -kA^2$$

That equation can be integrated:

$$\frac{dA}{A^2} == -k dt$$

$$-(A^{-1}-A_0^{-1}) = -k(t-t_0)$$

And solving for $A$:

$$A = \frac{1}{k(t-t_0) + A_0^{-1}}$$

That is the equation of a hyberbola. It goes to zero more slowly than a the expression for a first-order reaction, i.e. an exponential decay. This makes sense because as $A$ gets more and more diluted as the reaction occurs, collisions between $A$ molecules become rarer and rarer.

See this web page for more information.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.