2
$\begingroup$

Electrons that fill orbitals always do so in such a way that the resulting structure has the lowest energy state possible, though there are anomalies like chromium and so on.

But ionization no matter which element tends to violate this rule. When electrons are ionized they are from the outermost (valence) shell. But this doesn't always produce the lowest energy state possible like the case with 3d and 4s.

To clarify, all I am asking is why in that specific case, is the electron taken out of the 4s orbital first instead of the 3d orbital, since the 3d orbital is a higher energy level?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure what you mean by your question, but anomalies in e.config. are again because of reaching stability. The problem is for example the closeness of the energy of an empty 3d and an empty 4s. Still I was wondering if you would mind clarifying what you've written a bit, maybe some examples. $\endgroup$ – M.A.R. Feb 1 '15 at 17:22
3
$\begingroup$

Textbooks won't bother to dig into details. Most of them are satisfied with saying that such thing exists. They're right I guess. I'll do a chemguide approach to the answer since I find it most understandable.

enter image description here

We draw this diagram, and then assume that it works for all atoms. In other words, we assume that the energies of the various levels are always going to be those we draw in this diagram.

If you stop and think about it, that has got to be wrong. As you move from element to element across the Periodic Table, you are adding extra protons to the nucleus, and extra electrons around the nucleus.

The various attractions and repulsions in the atoms are bound to change as you do this - and it is those attractions and repulsions which govern the energies of the various orbitals.

Going through the Aufbau principle, when you pass Ca (Z = 20) you will face Sc, the first element in which a d orbital is going to be filled. But, you must make a really important change in your train of thoughts.

As chemguide explained, with change in the number of protons and electrons due to the change of Z, the way their orbitals' energies are defined changes. Till Ca, the behavior insisted that 4s has a lower energy state than 3d and thus, fills sooner. But, starting from Sc, the pattern changes: In Scandium, 3d has a lower energy than 4s. The behavior changed.

This change in behavior results in the current confusion of yours. This much answers the problem you have, and you can visit the page at chemguide to learn more. If you want more info, I can freely add. Hope I've helped!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.