2
$\begingroup$

I'd like to count the total valence electron of following neutral complex in the ionic counting (=donor-pair):

enter image description here

$\ce{Cl-}$ : 6e

$\ce{CH3-}$: 2e

$\ce{PPh3}$: 2e

gives 10e from these three ligands


1. Question: How to decide the charge of NO

a) if I set $\ce{NO+}$ the charge of Re must be +, therefore Re(I): d6

b) if I set $\ce{NO-}$ the charge of Re must be 2+, therefore Re(III): d4

Probably only a) gives tetragonal geometry whereas b) gives square-planar geometry, correct?

2. Question: How many electrons for NO (linear/bent)

a) I expect linear NO is in ionic counting way a 2e ligand (in covalent counting (=neutral ligand method) a 3e donor).

b) I expect bent NO is in ionic counting way a 2e ligand (in covalent counting (=neutral ligand method) a 1e donor).

3. Question: Total valence electron number

I remember: When we go from linear to bent the VE number decreases with -2, therefore I expect:

a) linear goes along with $\ce{NO+}$, therefore: 10 + 6 + 2 = 18 VE

b) bent goes along with $\ce{NO-}$, therefore: 10 + 4 + 2 = 16 VE


Especially with 1. Question I feel pretty uncomfortable.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ 1) square planar is for d8 only (this is mostly Co-group +1 and Ni-group +2, with virtually no examples outside these two columns) or ligands like porphyrins 2)this is somewhat simplified, but linear NO is NO+ (with extra electron given to central atom) and 2 electrons, but stable only with strong electron-donating systems, while bent NO is NO- and also 2 electrons. 3) without NO we have 7(Re(0)) + 5 (Cp) + 1 (CH3) + 2 (PPh3) = 15, 13 from NO. This is consistent with linear NO. $\endgroup$ – permeakra Jan 30 '15 at 13:35
  • $\begingroup$ what do you mean with "13 from NO." I expect the difference in VE number between bent and linear is only 1 (17 or 18 VE). $\endgroup$ – laminin Feb 2 '15 at 16:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ it's a typo, I meant 3 (three) And no, the difference is 2 (if you assume NO to be neutral) - either 3 (linear) or 1 (bent). Another common view is that NO is either NO+ (isoelectronic to linear CO or CN-) or bent NO- (and behaving like amine nitrogen). $\endgroup$ – permeakra Feb 2 '15 at 17:01
  • $\begingroup$ square planar is in normal cases only for d8. There are examples for Cu(+II) d9 in [Cu(NH3)4]2+ (reason: weak field) is also square planare. a) Would the case case for a very weak field be true for d10? I expect not. b) So d7 never gives square planar? $\endgroup$ – laminin Feb 2 '15 at 17:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Cu2+ is usually octahedral in water solutions. The two remaining ligands are water molecules and pretty easily exchange, but still. $d7$ usually are, to my knowledge, mostly unstable. Actually, I recalled 1 $d8$ outside Co/Ni group: Au3+ in $ce{[AuCl4]^{-}}$ - like complexes, it is square planar. $\endgroup$ – permeakra Feb 2 '15 at 18:11
-1
$\begingroup$

You need to follow the 18e- rule:

  1. NO+
  2. 2e electron donor
  3. 18 electrons
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can you elaborate a bit on how this answers the question at hand. Right now, it's very telegraphic and could use some elaboration. $\endgroup$ – jonsca Jan 30 '15 at 23:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.