0
$\begingroup$

Why doesn't unstable odd electron compound $\ce{NO}$ dimerize to $\ce{N2O2}$? Why doesn't this structure of ozonide dimerize? But why then does $\ce{BH3}$ dimerizes to $\ce{B2H6}$, and $\ce{AlCl3}$ to $\ce{Al2Cl6}$, both with something like bridged bonds?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your structure of ozone is incorrect; the positive formal charge should be on the central oxygen. $\endgroup$ – Jan Oct 25 at 4:39
7
$\begingroup$

Odd electron species do dimerize.

$\ce{NO}$

Nitric oxide dimerizes, but only at low temperature (and probably high pressure}.

$\ce{NO2}$

Nitrogen dioxide does dimerize. In fact, this is a well known property of $\ce{NO2}$. $\ce{NO2}$ (orange-brown) is in equilibrium with $\ce{N2O4}$ (colorless).

$$\ce{2NO2 <=> N2O4}$$ The position of this equilibrium is dependent on temperature and pressure (like all gas equilibria), and so it makes a nice demonstration of gas properties.

$\ce{O3}$

Ozone does not dimerize. Dimerization would lead to $\ce{O6}$, which likely is a 6-membered ring of all oxygen atoms. While this structure violates no rules, the oxygen-oxygen single bond is not stable. This instability of the peroxide bond makes it both useful and dangerous.

So why does $\ce{NO2}$ dimerize readily, $\ce{NO}$ dimerize under duress, and $\ce{O3}$ not dimerize at all?

The extra electron in the nitrogen oxides is found in an antibonding orbital. Conversion to the dimer gets that electron into a bonding orbital. There are no antibonding electrons in $\ce{O3}$.

$\ce{BH3}$

Borane dimerizes because the boron atom is electron deficient - it has an empty p orbital. This species is so electron deficient that it will form bonding interactions with nearly any electron pairs, including those already in sigma bonds. (More properly the B-H-B bonds are three-center-two-electron bonds). Aluminum compounds dimerize the same way.

So why does $\ce{BH3}$ dimerize and $\ce{O3}$ does not?

Ozone has no electron deficient atoms. Count the electrons. All atoms have an octet, and while one has a positive formal charge, the compound as a whole is not electron deficient.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.