For an elementary reaction like $$\ce{A + B -> AB},$$ $$K_{c} = \frac{\ce{[AB]}}{\ce{[A][B]}}$$ and $$\frac{\mathrm{d}\ce{[AB]}}{\mathrm{d}t} = k\ce{[A][B]}.$$ If I let the reaction reach equilibrium, and at this point, without altering temperature, suck away $\ce{A}$ and add $\ce{B}$ at the same rate (so $-\mathrm{d}\ce{[A]}/\mathrm{d}t = \mathrm{d}\ce{[B]}/\mathrm{d}t$) and alter both concentrations slightly, once I am finished, will the system still be in equilibrium or try to shift?

What if the reaction is not an elementary reaction such that $\frac{\mathrm{d}\ce{[AB]}}{\mathrm{d}t} = k\ce{[A]}^n\ce{[B]}^m$?


A single "elementary reaction" does not involve an equilibrium.

There must be a forward reaction and a reverse reaction to have an equilibrium. This is at least two elementary reactions.

Considering an equilbrium reaction: Just as a square encloses the most area for a rectangle of given perimeter, if the sum [A] + [B] is kept constant, [A][B] is maximal when [A] = [B]. Deviation from this maximum will shift the equilibrium away from the product and toward the reactants. In other words, if the system is at equilibrium with [A] = [B], and [A] is decreased and [B] increased, keeping [A] + [B] constant, there will be net reverse reaction until equilibrium is again reached, and [AB] at equilibrium will be less than orginally.

  • $\begingroup$ What if I maintain the product [A][B] to be constant while decreasing [A] and increasing [B]. After I stop, will the final state be at equilibrium? In both cases (maintaining [A][B] and [A]+[B] constant), does the new equilibrium state differ than the original? $\endgroup$ – Yandle Nov 26 '14 at 6:21
  • $\begingroup$ [A][B]=constant1; [A] + [B] = constant2. There are two equations and two unknowns, only two solutions at most (the intersections of a hyperbola and a line). In other words, you cannot decrease [A] and increase [B] while maintaining [A][B] and [A]+[B] constant. It is mathematically impossible. $\endgroup$ – DavePhD Nov 26 '14 at 12:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Yandle Instead, if you just keep [A][B] constant, decrease [A] and increase [B], without keeping [A]+[B] constant, the system will still be in equilibrium as long as [AB] is not changed. The decrease in [A] and increase in [B] would need to be in a manner that avoids changing the volume of the system, because changing the volume of the system with a constant amount of AB would change [AB]. $\endgroup$ – DavePhD Nov 26 '14 at 15:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.