-
1$\begingroup$ Huh? Check your images again--they both have 9 carbons, but you're adding an EtOH (2 carbons) to an 8-carbon molecule. I think once you make the numbers add up, you'll see the right answer. $\endgroup$– chipbusterNov 1, 2014 at 23:27
-
2$\begingroup$ Instead of the H, we should see a CH3 group. $\endgroup$– yolo123Nov 2, 2014 at 2:05
-
$\begingroup$ Excellent! Now if you draw the molecules with CH3 instead of hydrogens, what happens? $\endgroup$– chipbusterNov 2, 2014 at 2:22
-
$\begingroup$ We get the right amount of carbons? :P $\endgroup$– yolo123Nov 2, 2014 at 20:49
1 Answer
When you solvolyze the starting bromide a secondary carbocation would be generated. Since a secondary carbocation is not particularly stable, the molecule will explore other pathways such as hydrogen shift, alkyl shift, etc., in order to produce a more stable carbocation. The figure below, explores these options for your starting bromide. Realize that although I've drawn a discreet secondary carbocation that then undergoes rearrangement, in reality cation generation and alkyl or hydrogen shift may occur in a more or less concerted fashion.
In this case there are 3 options (actually there are 4 options, but the fourth one would produce a primary carbocation, so I left it out - can you find it?), a, b and c. Pathways a and c produce secondary carbocations; however pathway b, involving hydrogen shift, produces a more stable tertiary carbocation. Capture of the tertiary carbocation from pathway c by solvent should produce the expected product.
-
$\begingroup$ Very clear. Thanks ron. I guess I just wrongly wrote H instead of CH3 in my attempt to correct my answer. $\endgroup$– yolo123Nov 2, 2014 at 20:53