Being able to tailor the open pore size (and its distribution) allows you to be selective about the (maximal) size of molecules/branch of molecules able to enter the cavity of these heterogenic catalysts where the reaction can take place. As such, similar to artificial zeolithes with 3, 4, or about $\pu{5 Å}$ across the the open pores think (of ZSM-5) suitable for ion-exchange, drying water, or Bronstedt-acid catalyzed esterification/isomerization (e.g., p-xylene does not fit across pores of $\pu{3 Å}$ diameter).
With molecules (e.g., p-terephtalic acid) to keep the limits of the channels away, you already can estimate from the drawing board/synthetic route a size of the open pores and channels. Compared to the ones of alumosilicates, the accessible open pores and channels can be much wider than for alumosilicates, i.e. the inner of catalyst becomes accessible for larger molecules to transform. However since the framework is of organic molecules, it is less rigid/more flexible, too. This can be an advantage (if the MOF's structure adopts according to the guest molecule), or an disadvantage (an empty MOF easier crashes under mechanical stress compared to beads of zeolithes you can routinely pack into a column).
The step to bake the zeolithes (which costs time and energy) isn't there.