According to Wikipedia: "A chemical reaction is endergonic when non spontaneous. Thus in this type of reaction the Gibbs free energy increases."
My problem with that statement is the wording of "non-spontaneous" reactions. According to my knowledge, for every chemical reaction there is a ΔG, be it positive or negative, and is conncected to its equilibrium constant:
So in essence, if we only start with reactants, every reaction should yield some products, even if its ΔG is >0. Basically, every reaction is spontaneous to some extent. So is it only about semantics?
For example, in the biological context, even "non-spontaneous" reactions (with ΔG>0) can be driven to completion if its products are coupled to an exergonic reaction that consumes them and removes them from the endergonic equilibrium of the first reaction. That would mean that under those cirumstances the "non-spontaneous" reaction still produced some products (when starting with only reactants), is that right?
(What I also read though is that when stoechiometric molar quantities of reactants and products are mixed, more reactants are formed when ΔG is positive, so the reaction goes "in the wrong direction".)