1
$\begingroup$

For example let us take the reaction:

Zn(s) ---> Zn^2+(aq) + 2e^-(aq) ;ΔG°, which we are considering as our half cell

And now suppose, by taking the value of E° of SHE(Standard Hydrogen Electrode) as zero and using it as reference, we have measured the E° of the zinc electrode. But clearly this value is relative to SHE and not the absolute value.

Now we have the equation ΔG°= -nFE° , relating the change in Gibbs energy of the half cell reaction and the value of E°. The change in standard Gibbs energy of a reaction is constant at a constant temperature and has nothing to do with the chosen reference electrode so how can we relate both the values?

My another doubt is why even bother defining a reference electrode if we can find the electrode potentials of a half cell with its change in gibbs energy. Or is it the other way around, that we calculate the value of ΔG based on the measured value of E.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ A good question title should be simple, unique, resembling a magazine article headline or a book title, in plain text, optionally formulated as a question. Avoid click baits, titles saying too much or too little. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Oct 2, 2023 at 11:21
  • $\begingroup$ Chem+Math Expression formatting reference: MathJax Basics / Chem+Math expressions/formulas/equations / Upright vs italic / Math SE Mathjax tutorial // MathJax is preferred not to be used in CH SE Q titles. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Oct 2, 2023 at 11:38

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

If we use the tabelated reduction potential $E°$ of a half-reaction in the equation $ΔG° = -nFE°$ the we implicitly assume the reaction $\ce{Ox(aq) + $\frac n2$ H2(g) -> Red(aq) + n H+(aq)}$.

If other than SHE half reaction had been chosen as the conventional potential reference, the respective implicit reaction would have been different, with different $ΔG°$ and different $E°$ for both the reaction and the zinc half reaction.

If we consider two general half-reactions then $Δ_\text{r}G{^\circ} = -nF(E{^\circ}_\text{cathode} - E{^\circ}_\text{anode} )$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ So does that mean when i refer to the value of ΔG° of the reaction that i mentioned above , what is actually being implied is that its the ΔG° value for the reaction Zn(s) + 2H+(aq) ---> Zn2+(aq) + H2(g) ? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 2, 2023 at 10:53
  • $\begingroup$ It is, if the E° used in the equation is the E° for Zn^2+ + 2- -> Zn(s) half-reaction. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Oct 2, 2023 at 11:05
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! that fully cleared my doubt $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 2, 2023 at 11:40
  • $\begingroup$ Oops, I have overlooks the direction you have used. It is the opposite direction, H2 + Zn^2+ -> 2 H+ + Zn. E°Zn/Zn^2+ < 0, ΔG > 0 so your directions is not spontaneous reaction. The opposite one is. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Oct 2, 2023 at 11:43
0
$\begingroup$

You can’t calculate the Gibbs energy for a half cell, just like you can’t do a redox reaction with a half cell, only. In the formula $$ΔG°= -n F E°$$ the $E°$ refers to the cell potential, not the half cell reduction potential. The former is independent of a reference electrode, while the latter is not.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.