I've been having a lot of trouble trying to truly understand Gibbs free energy from a practical perspective. I have no background in physical chemistry, but I think I have a firm grasp on many of the concepts related to Gibbs energy. That being said, I'm going to try and reason using less rigorous mathematics. I'm having a hard time bridging the concepts of Gibbs free energy and the maximum useful non-PV work that can be extracted from an ideal chemical system.

My confusion may be due to some fundamental misunderstanding, but currently my confusion follows this line of thinking:

Most chemistry texts explain that $\Delta_\ G = wmax$.

The most common equations for calculating $\Delta_\ G$ are:

eq1. $\Delta_\ G = \Delta H - T\Delta S$

eq.2 $\Delta_\ G = \Delta G^\text{o} + RT\ln Q$

Both equations essentially make the same relationship, with the difference that $\Delta\Delta S_\mathrm{mixing}$ is baked in with $\Delta\ S^\text{0}$ in eq1.

Question 1.

This may just be a notation thing, but I want to confrim that $\Delta_\ G$ is just an alternative notation for $\Delta_\mathrm{r} G$ and $\Delta\ G^\text{o}$ is an alternative notation for $\Delta_\mathrm{r} G^\text{o}$. Considering I've seen both notations used and I think its safe to assume they are.

Question 2.

If $\Delta_\mathrm{r} G$ or alternatively, $\Delta\ G$ is the slope of the Gibbs energy curve at some non-standard state defined by the reaction quotient $Q$ how can this value be equal to the maximum useful non-PV work. I mean it would make sense if the system were at some steady-state such that the reaction continued to generate products with no net change in product/reactant concentrations. But in reality the value of $\Delta_\mathrm{r} G$ will continue to change until the reaction reaches its free energy minimum.

Maybe I'm trying to get these relations to do more than they meant to do. I fully appreciate that the slope of the Gibbs energy curve will allow for determination of conditions when $\Delta\ G = 0$ which is useful for predicting spontaneity. I just figured (probably incorrectly) that you could for example take some known mass of reactant and from there calculate the theoretical maximum non-PV work harvested from 100% reactants --> equilibrium.

Many Thanks!

enter image description here



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.